Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: recommendations of the International Working Group

In 2018, the US National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association proposed a purely biological definition of Alzheimer's disease that relies on biomarkers. Although the intended use of this framework was for research purposes, it has engendered debate and challenges regarding its...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLancet neurology Vol. 20; no. 6; pp. 484 - 496
Main Authors Dubois, Bruno, Villain, Nicolas, Frisoni, Giovanni B, Rabinovici, Gil D, Sabbagh, Marwan, Cappa, Stefano, Bejanin, Alexandre, Bombois, Stéphanie, Epelbaum, Stéphane, Teichmann, Marc, Habert, Marie-Odile, Nordberg, Agneta, Blennow, Kaj, Galasko, Douglas, Stern, Yaakov, Rowe, Christopher C, Salloway, Stephen, Schneider, Lon S, Cummings, Jeffrey L, Feldman, Howard H
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2021
Elsevier Limited
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In 2018, the US National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association proposed a purely biological definition of Alzheimer's disease that relies on biomarkers. Although the intended use of this framework was for research purposes, it has engendered debate and challenges regarding its use in everyday clinical practice. For instance, cognitively unimpaired individuals can have biomarker evidence of both amyloid β and tau pathology but will often not develop clinical manifestations in their lifetime. Furthermore, a positive Alzheimer's disease pattern of biomarkers can be observed in other brain diseases in which Alzheimer's disease pathology is present as a comorbidity. In this Personal View, the International Working Group presents what we consider to be the current limitations of biomarkers in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and, on the basis of this evidence, we propose recommendations for how biomarkers should and should not be used for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease in a clinical setting. We recommend that Alzheimer's disease diagnosis be restricted to people who have positive biomarkers together with specific Alzheimer's disease phenotypes, whereas biomarker-positive cognitively unimpaired individuals should be considered only at-risk for progression to Alzheimer's disease.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
BD and NV contributed equally to the manuscript. All authors conceptualised this Personal View. BD and NV curated the data. BD, NV, and HHF wrote the original draft. All authors revised and edited the manuscript and approved the final version. BD had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
Joint first authors
Contributors
ISSN:1474-4422
1474-4465
1474-4465
DOI:10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00066-1