Can a Patient's In-Hospital Length of Stay and Mortality Be Explained by Early-Risk Assessments?
To assess whether a patient's in-hospital length of stay (LOS) and mortality can be explained by early objective and/or physicians' subjective-risk assessments. Analysis of a detailed dataset of 1,021 patients admitted to a large U.S. hospital between January and September 2014. We empiric...
Saved in:
Published in | PloS one Vol. 11; no. 9; p. e0162976 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Public Library of Science
15.09.2016
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | To assess whether a patient's in-hospital length of stay (LOS) and mortality can be explained by early objective and/or physicians' subjective-risk assessments.
Analysis of a detailed dataset of 1,021 patients admitted to a large U.S. hospital between January and September 2014.
We empirically test the explanatory power of objective and subjective early-risk assessments using various linear and logistic regression models.
The objective measures of early warning can only weakly explain LOS and mortality. When controlled for various vital signs and demographics, objective signs lose their explanatory power. LOS and death are more associated with physicians' early subjective risk assessments than the objective measures.
Explaining LOS and mortality require variables beyond patients' initial medical risk measures. LOS and in-hospital mortality are more associated with the way in which the human element of healthcare service (e.g., physicians) perceives and reacts to the risks. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Conceptualization: NA NG JC. Data curation: NA. Formal analysis: NA NG JC. Funding acquisition: NG JC. Investigation: NA NG. Methodology: NA NG. Project administration: NA NG JC. Resources: NA NG JC. Software: NA NG. Supervision: NG JC. Validation: NA NG JC. Visualization: NA NG. Writing – original draft: NA NG. Writing – review & editing: NA NG JC. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. |
ISSN: | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0162976 |