Can a Patient's In-Hospital Length of Stay and Mortality Be Explained by Early-Risk Assessments?

To assess whether a patient's in-hospital length of stay (LOS) and mortality can be explained by early objective and/or physicians' subjective-risk assessments. Analysis of a detailed dataset of 1,021 patients admitted to a large U.S. hospital between January and September 2014. We empiric...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 11; no. 9; p. e0162976
Main Authors Azadeh-Fard, Nasibeh, Ghaffarzadegan, Navid, Camelio, Jaime A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 15.09.2016
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To assess whether a patient's in-hospital length of stay (LOS) and mortality can be explained by early objective and/or physicians' subjective-risk assessments. Analysis of a detailed dataset of 1,021 patients admitted to a large U.S. hospital between January and September 2014. We empirically test the explanatory power of objective and subjective early-risk assessments using various linear and logistic regression models. The objective measures of early warning can only weakly explain LOS and mortality. When controlled for various vital signs and demographics, objective signs lose their explanatory power. LOS and death are more associated with physicians' early subjective risk assessments than the objective measures. Explaining LOS and mortality require variables beyond patients' initial medical risk measures. LOS and in-hospital mortality are more associated with the way in which the human element of healthcare service (e.g., physicians) perceives and reacts to the risks.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Conceptualization: NA NG JC. Data curation: NA. Formal analysis: NA NG JC. Funding acquisition: NG JC. Investigation: NA NG. Methodology: NA NG. Project administration: NA NG JC. Resources: NA NG JC. Software: NA NG. Supervision: NG JC. Validation: NA NG JC. Visualization: NA NG. Writing – original draft: NA NG. Writing – review & editing: NA NG JC.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0162976