Monaural Beamforming in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users: Effect of (A)symmetric Directivity and Noise Type

To evaluate monaural beamforming in bimodally aided cochlear implant (CI) users. The study enrolled twelve adult bimodal listeners with at least six months of CI-experience and using a contralateral hearing aid (HA) most of the daytime. Participants were uniformly fitted with the same CI speech proc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 11; no. 8; p. e0160829
Main Authors Devocht, Elke M J, Janssen, A Miranda L, Chalupper, Josef, Stokroos, Robert J, George, Erwin L J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 18.08.2016
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To evaluate monaural beamforming in bimodally aided cochlear implant (CI) users. The study enrolled twelve adult bimodal listeners with at least six months of CI-experience and using a contralateral hearing aid (HA) most of the daytime. Participants were uniformly fitted with the same CI speech processor and HA, giving access to an identical monaural beamformer in both ears. A within-subject repeated measures design evaluated three directional configurations [omnidirectional, asymmetric directivity (in CI alone) and symmetric directivity (in both CI and HA)] in two noise types [stationary and fluctuating]. Bimodal speech reception thresholds (SRT) as well as listening effort ratings were assessed in a diffuse noise field. Symmetric monaural beamforming provided a significant SRT improvement of 2.6 dB SNR, compared to 1.6 dB SNR for asymmetric monaural beamforming. Directional benefits were similarly observed in stationary and fluctuating noise. Directivity did not contribute to less listening effort in addition to improvement in speech intelligibility. Bimodal performance was about 7 dB SNR worse in fluctuating than in stationary noise. Monaural beamforming provided substantial benefit for speech intelligibility in noise for bimodal listeners. The greatest benefit occurred when monaural beamforming was activated symmetrically in both CI and HA. Monaural beamforming does not bridge the gap between bimodal and normal hearing performance, especially in fluctuating noise. Results advocate further bimodal co-operation. This trial was registered in www.trialregister.nl under number NTR4901.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Conceived and designed the experiments: EMJD JC ELJG.Performed the experiments: EMJD.Analyzed the data: EMJD AMLJ.Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JC RJS.Wrote the paper: EMJD AMLJ ELJG.Contributed to revising the manuscript: RJS JC.
Competing Interests: The authors of this manuscript have read the journal's policy and have the following conflicts: the work of the first author (EMJD) in this investigator-initiated study was financially supported by a research grant from Advanced Bionics Inc. The second author (AMLJ) provided statistical support, made possible by a grant from the Dutch Heinsius-Houbolt foundation. The third author (JC) holds a scientific post in the Advanced Bionics European Research Center. For the remaining authors no conflicts were declared. The study was designed in close cooperation between MUMC+ and Advanced Bionics who also reviewed the final manuscript. Data collection, analysis and decision to publish were all solely accounted for by MUMC+.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0160829