High-Dose Opioid Prescribing and Opioid-Related Hospitalization: A Population-Based Study

To examine the impact of national clinical practice guidelines and provincial drug policy interventions on prevalence of high-dose opioid prescribing and rates of hospitalization for opioid toxicity. Interventional time-series analysis. Ontario, Canada, from 2003 to 2014. Ontario Drug Benefit (ODB)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 11; no. 12; p. e0167479
Main Authors Fernandes, Kimberly, Martins, Diana, Juurlink, David, Mamdani, Muhammad, Paterson, J Michael, Spooner, Luke, Singh, Samantha, Gomes, Tara
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 14.12.2016
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To examine the impact of national clinical practice guidelines and provincial drug policy interventions on prevalence of high-dose opioid prescribing and rates of hospitalization for opioid toxicity. Interventional time-series analysis. Ontario, Canada, from 2003 to 2014. Ontario Drug Benefit (ODB) beneficiaries aged 15 to 64 years from 2003 to 2014. Publication of Canadian clinical practice guidelines for use of opioids in chronic non-cancer pain (May 2010) and implementation of Ontario's Narcotics Safety and Awareness Act (NSAA; November 2011). Three outcomes were explored: the rate of opioid use among ODB beneficiaries, the prevalence of opioid prescriptions exceeding 200 mg and 400 mg morphine equivalents per day, and rates of opioid-related emergency department visits and hospital admissions. Over the 12 year study period, the rate of opioid use declined 15.2%, from 2764 to 2342 users per 10,000 ODB eligible persons. The rate of opioid use was significantly impacted by the Canadian clinical practice guidelines (p-value = .03) which led to a decline in use, but no impact was observed by the enactment of the NSAA (p-value = .43). Among opioid users, the prevalence of high-dose prescribing doubled (from 4.2% to 8.7%) over the study period. By 2014, 40.9% of recipients of long-acting opioids exceeded daily doses of 200 mg morphine or equivalent, including 55.8% of long-acting oxycodone users and 76.3% of transdermal fentanyl users. Moreover, in the last period, 18.7% of long-acting opioid users exceeded daily doses of 400 mg morphine or equivalent. Rates of opioid-related emergency department visits and hospital admissions increased 55.0% over the study period from 9.0 to 14.0 per 10,000 ODB beneficiaries from 2003 to 2013. This rate was not significantly impacted by the Canadian clinical practice guidelines (p-value = .68) or enactment of the NSAA (p-value = .59). Although the Canadian clinical practice guidelines for use of opioids in chronic non-cancer pain led to a decline in opioid prescribing rates among ODB beneficiaries these guidelines and subsequent Ontario legislation did not result in a significant change in rates of opioid-related hospitalizations. Given the prevalence of high dose opioid prescribing in this population, this suggests that improved strategies and programs for the safe prescribing of long-acting opioids are needed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Competing Interests: Competing interests of the authors include: MM has served on advisory boards and/or received honorariums for unrelated work from Astra Zeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffman La Roche, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer; KF is currently employed at Hoffman La Roche, however during the conduct of the project KF had no involvement with Hoffman La Roche and no competing interests as this employment initiated after the completion of data analysis and interpretation. MP and TG report grants from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care during the conduct of the study; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Conceptualization: LS TG.Data curation: KF.Formal analysis: LS KF DM TG.Funding acquisition: TG MM DJ.Methodology: LS KF DM DJ MM JMP TG SS.Project administration: SS.Supervision: TG.Visualization: LS TG.Writing – original draft: LS TG.Writing – review & editing: LS KF DM DJ MM JMP SS TG.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0167479