The Clinical Usefulness of Tuberculin Skin Test versus Interferon-Gamma Release Assays for Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis in HIV Patients: A Meta-Analysis

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 11; no. 9; p. e0161983
• Main Authors: Ayubi, Erfan, Doosti-Irani, Amin, Sanjari Moghaddam, Ali, Sani, Mohadeseh, Nazarzadeh, Milad, Mostafavi, Ehsan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 13.09.2016; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome; Activation; AIDS; Bias; Biological response modifiers; Biology and Life Sciences; Coinfection - diagnosis; Coinfection - microbiology; Coinfection - virology; Diagnosis; Discordance; Epidemics; Error analysis; Health aspects; Health risks; HIV; HIV Infections - complications; HIV Infections - microbiology; Human immunodeficiency virus; Humans; Infections; Interferon; Interferon-gamma Release Tests; Latent Tuberculosis - complications; Latent Tuberculosis - diagnosis; Lentivirus; Medical diagnosis; Medical tests; Medicine and Health Sciences; Meta-analysis; Mycobacterium; Patients; Physical Sciences; Regression analysis; Research and Analysis Methods; Retroviridae; Skin; Skin tests; Studies; Systematic review; Tuberculin; Tuberculin Test; Tuberculosis; Iran
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161983

Accurate diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is becoming increasingly concerning due to the increasing the HIV epidemic, which have increased the risk for reactivation to active tuberculosis (TB) infection. LTBI is diagnosed by tuberculin skin test (TST) and interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs). The aim of the present study was to conduct a meta-analysis of published papers on the agreement (kappa) between TST and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) tests for diagnosis of LTBI in HIV patient. Electronic databases including PubMed/Medline, Elsevier/Scopus and Embase/Ovid were reviewed up Jan. 2016. We performed a random effect model meta-analysis for estimation of pooled Kappa between the two methods of diagnosis. Meta regression was used for assessing potential heterogeneity and Egger's test was used for assessing small study effect and publication bias. The initial search strategy produced 6744 records. Of them, 23 cross-sectional studies met the inclusion criteria and 20 studies entered in meta-analysis. The pooled kappa was and prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) were 0.37 (95% CI: 0.28, 0.46) and 0.59 (0.49, 0.69). The discordance of TST-/QFT-GIT+ was more than TST+/QFT-GIT-. Kappa estimate between two tests was linearly associated with age and prevalence index and inversely associated with bias index. Fair agreement between TST and QFT-GIT makes it difficult to know whether TST is as useful as the QFT-GIT in HIV-infected patients. The higher discordance of TST-/QFT-GIT+ in compared to TST+/QFT-GIT- can induce the higher sensitivity of QFT-GIT for diagnosis LTBI in HIV patients. Disagreement between two tests can be influenced by error in measurements and prevalence of HIV.