Neural Signatures of the Reading-Writing Connection: Greater Involvement of Writing in Chinese Reading than English Reading

Research on cross-linguistic comparisons of the neural correlates of reading has consistently found that the left middle frontal gyrus (MFG) is more involved in Chinese than in English. However, there is a lack of consensus on the interpretation of the language difference. Because this region has be...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 11; no. 12; p. e0168414
Main Authors Cao, Fan, Perfetti, Charles A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 16.12.2016
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Research on cross-linguistic comparisons of the neural correlates of reading has consistently found that the left middle frontal gyrus (MFG) is more involved in Chinese than in English. However, there is a lack of consensus on the interpretation of the language difference. Because this region has been found to be involved in writing, we hypothesize that reading Chinese characters involves this writing region to a greater degree because Chinese speakers learn to read by repeatedly writing the characters. To test this hypothesis, we recruited English L1 learners of Chinese, who performed a reading task and a writing task in each language. The English L1 sample had learned some Chinese characters through character-writing and others through phonological learning, allowing a test of writing-on-reading effect. We found that the left MFG was more activated in Chinese than English regardless of task, and more activated in writing than in reading regardless of language. Furthermore, we found that this region was more activated for reading Chinese characters learned by character-writing than those learned by phonological learning. A major conclusion is that writing regions are also activated in reading, and that this reading-writing connection is modulated by the learning experience. We replicated the main findings in a group of native Chinese speakers, which excluded the possibility that the language differences observed in the English L1 participants were due to different language proficiency level.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Conceptualization: FC CAP.Data curation: FC CAP.Formal analysis: FC CAP.Funding acquisition: FC CAP.Investigation: FC CAP.Methodology: FC CAP.Project administration: FC CAP.Resources: FC CAP.Software: FC CAP.Supervision: FC CAP.Validation: FC CAP.Visualization: FC CAP.Writing – original draft: FC CAP.Writing – review & editing: FC CAP.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0168414