The Perception of Physician Empathy by Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease
This study focused on the difference between perceived and desired physician empathy (pPE and dPE) in the eye of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It was investigated if a discrepancy (ΔPE) correlates with trust and satisfaction of patients. At the same time the aim was to gain detaile...
Saved in:
Published in | PloS one Vol. 11; no. 11; p. e0167113 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Public Library of Science
22.11.2016
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This study focused on the difference between perceived and desired physician empathy (pPE and dPE) in the eye of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It was investigated if a discrepancy (ΔPE) correlates with trust and satisfaction of patients. At the same time the aim was to gain detailed information about the subjective burden of disease and the resources of IBD patients, in order to better understand them.
A modified version of the German Version of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure was completed as a paper-and-pencil questionnaire by IBD patients attending our facility (n = 32) and as an online survey by IBD patients at other locations throughout Germany (n = 89). Patients were in average 36.3±12 years old.
The mean (SD) rating of pPE was 3.93 (0.96) on a scale of 1 to 5 ("poor" to "excellent"); however, the mean (SD) dPE was 4.38 (0.48) on the same scale. ΔPE correlated with perceived empathy and with patients' satisfaction with treatment and trust in their health care providers. Patients reported quite a high subjective burden (mean [SD]: 2.93 [.63]) and named family, friends, and support groups as resources.
Rather than assessing patient satisfaction with treatment and trust in their physician only with perceived PE, we suggest ΔPE as a useful additional parameter. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Conceptualization: MS GD.Data curation: MW GD.Formal analysis: MW GD MS CC.Investigation: MW.Methodology: MS GD MW VG CC.Resources: MS GD MW VG CC.Supervision: MS GD.Validation: MS GD MW VG CC.Visualization: MS GD CC.Writing – original draft: CC GD MS.Writing – review & editing: CC MS GD MW VG. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Current address: Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany |
ISSN: | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0167113 |