The Perception of Physician Empathy by Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

This study focused on the difference between perceived and desired physician empathy (pPE and dPE) in the eye of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It was investigated if a discrepancy (ΔPE) correlates with trust and satisfaction of patients. At the same time the aim was to gain detaile...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 11; no. 11; p. e0167113
Main Authors Chiapponi, Costanza, Witt, Maxie, Dlugosch, Gabriele E, Gülberg, Veit, Siebeck, Matthias
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 22.11.2016
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study focused on the difference between perceived and desired physician empathy (pPE and dPE) in the eye of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It was investigated if a discrepancy (ΔPE) correlates with trust and satisfaction of patients. At the same time the aim was to gain detailed information about the subjective burden of disease and the resources of IBD patients, in order to better understand them. A modified version of the German Version of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure was completed as a paper-and-pencil questionnaire by IBD patients attending our facility (n = 32) and as an online survey by IBD patients at other locations throughout Germany (n = 89). Patients were in average 36.3±12 years old. The mean (SD) rating of pPE was 3.93 (0.96) on a scale of 1 to 5 ("poor" to "excellent"); however, the mean (SD) dPE was 4.38 (0.48) on the same scale. ΔPE correlated with perceived empathy and with patients' satisfaction with treatment and trust in their health care providers. Patients reported quite a high subjective burden (mean [SD]: 2.93 [.63]) and named family, friends, and support groups as resources. Rather than assessing patient satisfaction with treatment and trust in their physician only with perceived PE, we suggest ΔPE as a useful additional parameter.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Conceptualization: MS GD.Data curation: MW GD.Formal analysis: MW GD MS CC.Investigation: MW.Methodology: MS GD MW VG CC.Resources: MS GD MW VG CC.Supervision: MS GD.Validation: MS GD MW VG CC.Visualization: MS GD CC.Writing – original draft: CC GD MS.Writing – review & editing: CC MS GD MW VG.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Current address: Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0167113