Does the Sign of the Cu-Gd Magnetic Interaction Depend on the Number of Atoms in the Bridge?

Several theoretical investigations with CASSCF methods confirm that the magnetic behavior of Cu–Gd complexes can only be reproduced if the 5d Gd orbitals are included in the active space. These orbitals, expected to be unoccupied, do present a low spin density, which is mainly due to a spin polariza...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inChemistry : a European journal Vol. 22; no. 6; pp. 2171 - 2180
Main Authors Costes, Jean-Pierre, Duhayon, Carine, Mallet-Ladeira, Sonia, Shova, Sergiu, Vendier, Laure
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published WEINHEIM Blackwell Publishing Ltd 05.02.2016
Wiley
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Wiley-VCH Verlag
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Several theoretical investigations with CASSCF methods confirm that the magnetic behavior of Cu–Gd complexes can only be reproduced if the 5d Gd orbitals are included in the active space. These orbitals, expected to be unoccupied, do present a low spin density, which is mainly due to a spin polarization effect. This theory is strengthened by the experimental results reported herein. We demonstrate that Cu–Gd complexes characterized by Cu–Gd interactions through single‐oxygen and three‐atom bridges consisting of oxygen, carbon, and nitrogen atoms, present weak ferromagnetic exchange interactions, whereas complexes with bridges made of two atoms, such as the nitrogen–oxygen oximato bridge, are subject to weak antiferromagnetic exchange interactions. Therefore, a bridge with an odd number of atoms induces a weak ferromagnetic exchange interaction, whereas a bridge with an even number of atoms supports a weak antiferromagnetic exchange interaction, as observed in pure organic compounds and also, as in this case, in metal–organic compounds with an active spin polarization effect. Bridge over Cu–Gd: Observation of ferromagnetic Cu–Gd exchange interactions through one‐ and three‐atom bridges and of antiferromagnetic Cu–Gd exchange interactions through two‐atom bridges is consistent with an active spin polarization mechanism in Cu–Gd complexes (see figure).
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-GL1G42HT-6
ArticleID:CHEM201504238
CNRS - No. NMP3-CT-2005-515767
istex:6C9551843B9B4E901742D8F537DF99A269F58C78
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0947-6539
1521-3765
1521-3765
DOI:10.1002/chem.201504238