Training in the Gap Between Conditioning and Learning

Biofeedback intervention draws from multiple attitudes toward healing: mind-body medicine, behavioral psychology, sport psychology, experimental psychology, contemplative practices, and so forth. The most prominent approach is behavioral psychology. Following this psychological orientation, we use b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiofeedback (Wheat Ridge, Colo.) Vol. 49; no. 4; pp. 95 - 98
Main Authors Ehrenreich, Yossi, Rolnick, Arnon, Leighton, Adam
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Lawrence Allen Press Inc 01.12.2021
Subjects
Behavior
Behavioral psychology
Biofeedback
Cognition & reasoning
Conditioning
Contemplative practice
Emotions
Experimental psychology
Feedback
Healing
Intervention
Learning
Mind and body
Physiology
Psychology
Skills
Sports psychology
Taxonomy
Therapists
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Biofeedback intervention draws from multiple attitudes toward healing: mind-body medicine, behavioral psychology, sport psychology, experimental psychology, contemplative practices, and so forth. The most prominent approach is behavioral psychology. Following this psychological orientation, we use biofeedback instrumentation as a conditioning methodology. On the other hand, drawing from experimental psychology, the same instrumentation is used to achieve awareness. Awareness does not necessarily precede change. This article aims first to outline the difference between conditioning and learning and then introduce a session format that promotes learning.
ISSN:1081-5937
2158-348X
DOI:10.5298/1081-5937-49.04.06