Effects of Moderate Hyperventilation on Jugular Bulb Gases under Propofol or Isoflurane Anesthesia during Supratentorial Craniotomy

Background:The optimal ventilated status under total intravenous or inhalation anesthesia in neurosurgical patients with a supratentorial tumor has not been ascertained.The purpose of this study was to intraoperatively compare the effects of moderate hyperventilation on the jugular bulb oxygen satur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inChinese medical journal Vol. 128; no. 10; pp. 1321 - 1325
Main Authors Meng, Lan, Li, Shu-Qin, Ji, Nan, Luo, Fang
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published China Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd 20.05.2015
Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management,Beijing Tiantan Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100050,China%Department of Neurosurgery,Beijing Tiantan Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100050,China
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
Wolters Kluwer
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background:The optimal ventilated status under total intravenous or inhalation anesthesia in neurosurgical patients with a supratentorial tumor has not been ascertained.The purpose of this study was to intraoperatively compare the effects of moderate hyperventilation on the jugular bulb oxygen saturation (SjO2),cerebral oxygen extraction ratio (O2ER),mean arterial blood pressure (MAP),and heart rate (HR) in patients with a supratentorial tumor under different anesthetic regimens.Methods:Twenty adult patients suffered from supratentorial tumors were randomly assigned to receive a propofol infusion followed by isoflurane anesthesia after a 30-min stabilization period or isoflurane followed by propofol.The patients were randomized to one of the following two treatment sequences:hyperventilation followed by normoventilation or normoventilation followed by hyperventilation during isoflurane or propofol anesthesia,respectively.The ventilation and end-tidal CO2 tension were maintained at a constant level for 20 min.Radial arterial and jugular bulb catheters were inserted for the blood gas sampling.At the end of each study period,we measured the change in the arterial and jugular bulb blood gases.Results:The mean value of the jugular bulb oxygen saturation (SjO2) significantly decreased,and the oxygen extraction ratio (O2ER) significantly increased under isoflurane or propofol anesthesia during hyperventilation compared with those during normoventilation (SjO2:t =-2.728,P =0.011 or t =-3.504,P =0.001;O2ER:t =2.484,P =0.020 or t =2.892,P =0.009).The SjO2 significantly decreased,and the O2ER significantly increased under propofol anesthesia compared with those values under isoflurane anesthesia during moderate hyperventilation (SjO2:t =-2.769,P =0.012;O2ER:t =2.719,P =0.013).In the study,no significant changes in the SjO2 and the O2ER were observed under propofol compared with those values under isoflurane during normoventilation.Conclusions:Our results suggest that the optimal ventilated status under propofol or isoflurane anesthesia in neurosurgical patients varies.Hyperventilation under propofol anesthesia should be cautiously performed in neurosurgery to maintain an improved balance between the cerebral oxygen supply and demand.
Bibliography:Hyperventilation; Isoflurane; Neuroanesthesia; Propofol
Lan Meng, Shu-Qin Li, Nan Ji, Fang Luo(Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China 2Bepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Belling 100050, China)
Background:The optimal ventilated status under total intravenous or inhalation anesthesia in neurosurgical patients with a supratentorial tumor has not been ascertained.The purpose of this study was to intraoperatively compare the effects of moderate hyperventilation on the jugular bulb oxygen saturation (SjO2),cerebral oxygen extraction ratio (O2ER),mean arterial blood pressure (MAP),and heart rate (HR) in patients with a supratentorial tumor under different anesthetic regimens.Methods:Twenty adult patients suffered from supratentorial tumors were randomly assigned to receive a propofol infusion followed by isoflurane anesthesia after a 30-min stabilization period or isoflurane followed by propofol.The patients were randomized to one of the following two treatment sequences:hyperventilation followed by normoventilation or normoventilation followed by hyperventilation during isoflurane or propofol anesthesia,respectively.The ventilation and end-tidal CO2 tension were maintained at a constant level for 20 min.Radial arterial and jugular bulb catheters were inserted for the blood gas sampling.At the end of each study period,we measured the change in the arterial and jugular bulb blood gases.Results:The mean value of the jugular bulb oxygen saturation (SjO2) significantly decreased,and the oxygen extraction ratio (O2ER) significantly increased under isoflurane or propofol anesthesia during hyperventilation compared with those during normoventilation (SjO2:t =-2.728,P =0.011 or t =-3.504,P =0.001;O2ER:t =2.484,P =0.020 or t =2.892,P =0.009).The SjO2 significantly decreased,and the O2ER significantly increased under propofol anesthesia compared with those values under isoflurane anesthesia during moderate hyperventilation (SjO2:t =-2.769,P =0.012;O2ER:t =2.719,P =0.013).In the study,no significant changes in the SjO2 and the O2ER were observed under propofol compared with those values under isoflurane during normoventilation.Conclusions:Our results suggest that the optimal ventilated status under propofol or isoflurane anesthesia in neurosurgical patients varies.Hyperventilation under propofol anesthesia should be cautiously performed in neurosurgery to maintain an improved balance between the cerebral oxygen supply and demand.
11-2154/R
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0366-6999
2542-5641
DOI:10.4103/0366-6999.156775