"What else are you worried about?" – Integrating textual responses into quantitative social science research
Open-ended questions have routinely been included in large-scale survey and panel studies, yet there is some perplexity about how to actually incorporate the answers to such questions into quantitative social science research. Tools developed recently in the domain of natural language processing off...
Saved in:
Published in | PloS one Vol. 12; no. 7; pp. 1 - 34 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
San Francisco
Public Library of Science
31.07.2017
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Open-ended questions have routinely been included in large-scale survey and panel studies, yet there is some perplexity about how to actually incorporate the answers to such questions into quantitative social science research. Tools developed recently in the domain of natural language processing offer a wide range of options for the automated analysis of such textual data, but their implementation has lagged behind. In this study, we demonstrate straightforward procedures that can be applied to process and analyze textual data for the purposes of quantitative social science research. Using more than 35,000 textual answers to the question “What else are you worried about?” from participants of the German Socio-economic Panel Study (SOEP), we (1) analyzed characteristics of respondents that determined whether they answered the open-ended question, (2) used the textual data to detect relevant topics that were reported by the respondents, and (3) linked the features of the respondents to the worries they reported in their textual data. The potential uses as well as the limitations of the automated analysis of textual data are discussed. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Conceptualization: JMR MB SCS GGW.Data curation: JG.Formal analysis: JMR MB.Methodology: JMR MB SCS.Resources: GGW JG.Software: MB.Supervision: SCS GGW.Visualization: JMR MB.Writing – original draft: JMR SCS.Writing – review & editing: JMR SCS MB JG GGW. |
ISSN: | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0182156 |