The Evolution of Roosevelt's Rhetorical Legacy: Presidential Rhetoric about Rights in Domestic and Foreign Affairs, 1933-2011

Scholars view the domestic and foreign commitments of the New Deal and Great Society as embodying rights with quasi-constitutional status. But little research has examined whether presidents have encouraged citizens to perceive New Deal/Great Society commitments as deserving of extraordinary venerat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPresidential studies quarterly Vol. 43; no. 3; pp. 562 - 591
Main Author Rhodes, Jesse H.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2013
Wiley Periodicals, Inc
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Center for the Study of the Presidency
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Scholars view the domestic and foreign commitments of the New Deal and Great Society as embodying rights with quasi-constitutional status. But little research has examined whether presidents have encouraged citizens to perceive New Deal/Great Society commitments as deserving of extraordinary veneration. Based on a quantitative content analysis of hundreds major presidential addresses and a qualitative analysis of inaugural addresses over the 1933-2011, this article shows that presidents have largely declined to characterize major domestic commitments as rights but that they have repeatedly described the United States 1 mission in foreign affairs in terms of protecting human rights.
Bibliography:ArticleID:PSQ12046
ark:/67375/WNG-VTW6WB5V-P
istex:18B828483527EA1491F6E646BA36D82CBEBFA1EA
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0360-4918
1741-5705
DOI:10.1111/psq.12046