The Evolution of Roosevelt's Rhetorical Legacy: Presidential Rhetoric about Rights in Domestic and Foreign Affairs, 1933-2011
Scholars view the domestic and foreign commitments of the New Deal and Great Society as embodying rights with quasi-constitutional status. But little research has examined whether presidents have encouraged citizens to perceive New Deal/Great Society commitments as deserving of extraordinary venerat...
Saved in:
Published in | Presidential studies quarterly Vol. 43; no. 3; pp. 562 - 591 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Washington
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.09.2013
Wiley Periodicals, Inc John Wiley & Sons, Inc Center for the Study of the Presidency |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Scholars view the domestic and foreign commitments of the New Deal and Great Society as embodying rights with quasi-constitutional status. But little research has examined whether presidents have encouraged citizens to perceive New Deal/Great Society commitments as deserving of extraordinary veneration. Based on a quantitative content analysis of hundreds major presidential addresses and a qualitative analysis of inaugural addresses over the 1933-2011, this article shows that presidents have largely declined to characterize major domestic commitments as rights but that they have repeatedly described the United States 1 mission in foreign affairs in terms of protecting human rights. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:PSQ12046 ark:/67375/WNG-VTW6WB5V-P istex:18B828483527EA1491F6E646BA36D82CBEBFA1EA ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0360-4918 1741-5705 |
DOI: | 10.1111/psq.12046 |