Bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) use social information as an indicator of safety in dangerous environments

Avoiding predation is one of the most important challenges that an animal faces. Several anti-predation behaviours can be employed, yet simply using the presence of conspecifics can be a good signal of safety in an environment with potential predation hazards. Here, we show, for the first time, that...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Vol. 281; no. 1785; p. 20133174
Main Authors Dawson, Erika H., Chittka, Lars
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England The Royal Society 22.06.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Avoiding predation is one of the most important challenges that an animal faces. Several anti-predation behaviours can be employed, yet simply using the presence of conspecifics can be a good signal of safety in an environment with potential predation hazards. Here, we show, for the first time, that past experience of predation causes bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) to aggregate with conspecifics, facilitating the identification of safe foraging patches. Bees were trained to differentiate between flowers that harboured predators and flowers that were predator free. When test subjects were subsequently presented solely with the previously predator-infested flower species, there was a significant preference to only land on flowers occupied by other feeding conspecifics. Yet, when safe flowers were made available to subjects previously entrained to discriminate safe from predator-occupied flowers, subjects ignored other bees and the social information potentially provided by them, demonstrating that attraction towards conspecifics is confined to dangerous situations. Our findings demonstrate a previously unknown social interaction in pollinators which may have important implications for plant–pollinator interactions.
Bibliography:istex:51120517793ADDC03B6B7F821322F25E22806FF4
href:rspb20133174.pdf
ark:/67375/V84-RDQZ6F6H-3
ArticleID:rspb20133174
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0962-8452
1471-2954
1471-2945
1471-2954
DOI:10.1098/rspb.2013.3174