Peripheral antinociceptive effects of inhibitors of monoacylglycerol lipase in a rat model of inflammatory pain

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The endocannabinoid 2‐arachidonoylglycerol (2‐AG) is degraded primarily by monoacylglycerol lipase (MGL). We compared peripheral antinociceptive effects of JZL184, a novel irreversible MGL inhibitor, with the reversible MGL‐preferring inhibitor URB602 and exogenous 2‐AG in rat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of pharmacology Vol. 163; no. 7; pp. 1464 - 1478
Main Authors Guindon, Josée, Guijarro, Ana, Piomelli, Daniele, Hohmann, Andrea G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.08.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The endocannabinoid 2‐arachidonoylglycerol (2‐AG) is degraded primarily by monoacylglycerol lipase (MGL). We compared peripheral antinociceptive effects of JZL184, a novel irreversible MGL inhibitor, with the reversible MGL‐preferring inhibitor URB602 and exogenous 2‐AG in rats. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH Nociception in the formalin test was assessed in groups receiving dorsal paw injections of vehicle, JZL184 (0.001–300 µg), URB602 (0.001–600 µg), 2‐AG (ED50), 2‐AG + JZL184 (at their ED50), 2‐AG + URB602 (at their ED50), AM251 (80 µg), AM251 + JZL184 (10 µg), AM630 (25 µg) or AM630 + JZL184 (10 µg). Effects of MGL inhibitors on endocannabinoid accumulation and on activities of endocannabinoid‐metabolizing enzymes were assessed. KEY RESULTS Intra‐paw administration of JZL184, URB602 and 2‐AG suppressed early and late phases of formalin pain. JZL184 and URB602 acted through a common mechanism. JZL184 (ED50 Phase 1: 0.06 ± 0.028; Phase 2: 0.03 ± 0.011 µg) produced greater antinociception than URB602 (ED50 Phase 1: 120 ± 51.3; Phase 2: 66 ± 23.9 µg) or 2‐AG. Both MGL inhibitors produced additive antinociceptive effects when combined with 2‐AG. Antinociceptive effects of JZL184, like those of URB602, were blocked by cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) and cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2) antagonists. JZL184 suppressed MGL but not fatty‐acid amide hydrolase or N‐arachidonoyl‐phosphatidylethanolamine phospholipase D activities ex vivo. URB602 increased hind paw 2‐AG without altering anandamide levels. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS MGL inhibitors suppressed formalin‐induced pain through peripheral CB1 and CB2 receptor mechanisms. MGL inhibition increased paw skin 2‐AG accumulation to mediate these effects. MGL represents a target for the treatment of inflammatory pain. LINKED ARTICLES This article is part of a themed issue on Cannabinoids in Biology and Medicine. To view the other articles in this issue visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2011.163.issue‐7
ISSN:0007-1188
1476-5381
DOI:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.01192.x