Integration of genetic, clinical, and INR data to refine warfarin dosing

Well-characterized genes that affect warfarin metabolism (cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9) and sensitivity (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1 (VKORC1)) explain one-third of the variability in therapeutic dose before the international normalized ratio (INR) is measured. To determine genotypic relevance...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical pharmacology and therapeutics Vol. 87; no. 5; p. 572
Main Authors Lenzini, P, Wadelius, M, Kimmel, S, Anderson, J L, Jorgensen, A L, Pirmohamed, M, Caldwell, M D, Limdi, N, Burmester, J K, Dowd, M B, Angchaisuksiri, P, Bass, A R, Chen, J, Eriksson, N, Rane, A, Lindh, J D, Carlquist, J F, Horne, B D, Grice, G, Milligan, P E, Eby, C, Shin, J, Kim, H, Kurnik, D, Stein, C M, McMillin, G, Pendleton, R C, Berg, R L, Deloukas, P, Gage, B F
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.05.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Well-characterized genes that affect warfarin metabolism (cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9) and sensitivity (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1 (VKORC1)) explain one-third of the variability in therapeutic dose before the international normalized ratio (INR) is measured. To determine genotypic relevance after INR becomes available, we derived clinical and pharmacogenetic refinement algorithms on the basis of INR values (on day 4 or 5 of therapy), clinical factors, and genotype. After adjusting for INR, CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotypes remained significant predictors (P < 0.001) of warfarin dose. The clinical algorithm had an R(2) of 48% (median absolute error (MAE): 7.0 mg/week) and the pharmacogenetic algorithm had an R(2) of 63% (MAE: 5.5 mg/week) in the derivation set (N = 969). In independent validation sets, the R(2) was 26-43% with the clinical algorithm and 42-58% when genotype was added (P = 0.002). After several days of therapy, a pharmacogenetic algorithm estimates the therapeutic warfarin dose more accurately than one using clinical factors and INR response alone.
ISSN:1532-6535
DOI:10.1038/clpt.2010.13