Mobilization Techniques in Subjects With Frozen Shoulder Syndrome: Randomized Multiple-Treatment Trial

The purpose of this study was to compare the use of 3 mobilization techniques--end-range mobilization (ERM), mid-range mobilization (MRM), and mobilization with movement (MWM)--in the management of subjects with frozen shoulder syndrome (FSS). Twenty-eight subjects with FSS were recruited. A multipl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhysical therapy Vol. 87; no. 10; pp. 1307 - 1315
Main Authors Yang, Jing-lan, Chang, Chein-wei, Chen, Shiau-yee, Wang, Shwu-Fen, Lin, Jiu-jenq
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Physical Therapy Association 01.10.2007
Oxford University Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The purpose of this study was to compare the use of 3 mobilization techniques--end-range mobilization (ERM), mid-range mobilization (MRM), and mobilization with movement (MWM)--in the management of subjects with frozen shoulder syndrome (FSS). Twenty-eight subjects with FSS were recruited. A multiple-treatment trial on 2 groups (A-B-A-C and A-C-A-B, where A=MRM, B=ERM, and C=MWM) was carried out. The duration of each treatment was 3 weeks, for a total of 12 weeks. Outcome measures included the functional score and shoulder kinematics. Overall, subjects in both groups improved over the 12 weeks. Statistically significant improvements were found in ERM and MWM. Additionally, MWM corrected scapulohumeral rhythm significantly better than ERM did. In subjects with FSS, ERM and MWM were more effective than MRM in increasing mobility and functional ability. Movement strategies in terms of scapulohumeral rhythm improved after 3 weeks of MWM.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0031-9023
1538-6724
DOI:10.2522/ptj.20060295