A LASTING STORY: CONSERVATION AND AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICES IN COLONIAL MALAWI

• Published in: Journal of African history Vol. 50; no. 2; pp. 247 - 267
• Main Author: GREEN, ERIK
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.01.2009
• Subjects: Africa; African history; African studies; Agrarhistoria; Agricultural development; Agricultural history; Agriculture; Annual reports; Colonial Conservation Measures; Colonial government; Colonial history; Colonialism; Colonization.(colonial history and chronicles); Conservation; Crop production; Crops; development; Economic History; Economics and Business; Ekonomi och näringsliv; Ekonomisk historia; Environment; Ethnology; Farm economics; Farming; Governors; Historical source materials; Historieämnen; Historisk-filosofiska ämnen; History and philosophy subjects; History subjects; HUMANIORA och RELIGIONSVETENSKAP; HUMANITIES and RELIGION; Malawi; Peasant agriculture; Peasant class; Rural areas; Rural extension; Samhällsvetenskap; Social Sciences; Soil conservation; Sources and methods; Colonial period; Malawi; East Africa; agriculture; development; environment; Malawi; Conservation; Development; Environment; Strategy; Agriculture; Colonial administration; Rural community
• ISSN: 0021-8537; 1469-5138; 1469-5138
• DOI: 10.1017/S0021853709990028

Historians have written extensively about agricultural extension services and the linkages between colonial administrations and rural communities in British Africa. Most studies argue that it is possible to identify a qualitative shift in strategies between the inter- and the post-war periods. The former is characterized by modest attempts at promoting soil conservation, while the latter is described as a period when colonial governments in British Africa – guided by scientific knowledge – tried to transform peasant agriculture to increase production. This article questions this division by using colonial Malawi as a case. It reveals that the strategies and intensity of agricultural extension services changed over time but that the aim of intervention, i.e. to combat soil erosion, remained the focal point throughout the colonial period. This shows that it is important to distinguish between strategies and scale of intervention on the one hand and their aims and contents on the other. Changes in the former took place within the conservation paradigm. Additionally, this article reveals that agricultural extension services were directed by colonial officials' perceptions about African farmers rather than detailed empirical knowledge about existing farming methods.