Accurate and robust whole-head segmentation from magnetic resonance images for individualized head modeling

• Published in: NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Vol. 219; p. 117044
• Main Authors: Puonti, Oula, Van Leemput, Koen, Saturnino, Guilherme B., Siebner, Hartwig R., Madsen, Kristoffer H., Thielscher, Axel
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.10.2020; Elsevier Limited; Elsevier
• Subjects: Accuracy; Automation; Brain - diagnostic imaging; Brain - physiology; Brain mapping; Brain Mapping - methods; Computer Simulation; Datasets; Electric fields; Electroencephalography; Head; Head - diagnostic imaging; Head - physiology; Head segmentation; Humans; Image processing; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; Magnetic fields; Magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods; Magnetoencephalography; MRI; Non-invasive brain stimulation; Open source software; Segmentation; Simulation; Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation; Volume conductor modeling; Non-invasive brain stimulation; Volume conductor modeling; Electroencephalography; MRI; Magnetoencephalography; Head segmentation
• ISSN: 1053-8119; 1095-9572; 1095-9572
• DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117044

Transcranial brain stimulation (TBS) has been established as a method for modulating and mapping the function of the human brain, and as a potential treatment tool in several brain disorders. Typically, the stimulation is applied using a one-size-fits-all approach with predetermined locations for the electrodes, in electric stimulation (TES), or the coil, in magnetic stimulation (TMS), which disregards anatomical variability between individuals. However, the induced electric field distribution in the head largely depends on anatomical features implying the need for individually tailored stimulation protocols for focal dosing. This requires detailed models of the individual head anatomy, combined with electric field simulations, to find an optimal stimulation protocol for a given cortical target. Considering the anatomical and functional complexity of different brain disorders and pathologies, it is crucial to account for the anatomical variability in order to translate TBS from a research tool into a viable option for treatment. In this article we present a new method, called CHARM, for automated segmentation of fifteen different head tissues from magnetic resonance (MR) scans. The new method compares favorably to two freely available software tools on a five-tissue segmentation task, while obtaining reasonable segmentation accuracy over all fifteen tissues. The method automatically adapts to variability in the input scans and can thus be directly applied to clinical or research scans acquired with different scanners, sequences or settings. We show that an increase in automated segmentation accuracy results in a lower relative error in electric field simulations when compared to anatomical head models constructed from reference segmentations. However, also the improved segmentations and, by implication, the electric field simulations are affected by systematic artifacts in the input MR scans. As long as the artifacts are unaccounted for, this can lead to local simulation differences up to 30% of the peak field strength on reference simulations. Finally, we exemplarily demonstrate the effect of including all fifteen tissue classes in the field simulations against the standard approach of using only five tissue classes and show that for specific stimulation configurations the local differences can reach 10% of the peak field strength. •We introduce a new automated method for whole-head segmentation.•The method segments 15 different head tissues covering also the neck.•The segmentation accuracy and robustness compare favorably to existing tools.•Choice of scan parameters can cause segmentation and simulation errors up to 30%.•Including extra tissues into the simulation affects the electric field locally.