Clinical efficacy of 300IR 5-grass pollen sublingual tablet in a US study: The importance of allergen-specific serum IgE

Previous trials have demonstrated the efficacy, safety, and optimal dosage of the 5-grass pollen sublingual tablet for adults and children with grass pollen–induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 300 index of reactivity (IR) 5-grass pollen sublingual t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of allergy and clinical immunology Vol. 130; no. 6; pp. 1327 - 1334.e1
Main Authors Cox, Linda S., Casale, Thomas B., Nayak, Anjuli S., Bernstein, David I., Creticos, Peter S., Ambroisine, Laurence, Melac, Michel, Zeldin, Robert K.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Mosby, Inc 01.12.2012
Elsevier
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
WAO
LS
IR
CS
ARC
RSS
SPT
FAS
RMS
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Previous trials have demonstrated the efficacy, safety, and optimal dosage of the 5-grass pollen sublingual tablet for adults and children with grass pollen–induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 300 index of reactivity (IR) 5-grass pollen sublingual tablet in US adults. Adults with grass pollen allergy and Rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom Scores of 12 or greater (scale, 0-18) during the previous grass pollen season were randomized in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study to receive 300IR 5-grass pollen sublingual tablet or placebo starting 4 months before and continuing through the pollen season. The primary efficacy end point was the daily Combined Score (CS; scale, 0-3), which integrates symptoms and rescue medication use. Four hundred seventy-three participants were randomized. The mean daily CS over the pollen period was significantly lower in the active treatment group versus the placebo group (least-squares mean difference: −0.13; 95% CI, −0.19 to −0.06; P = .0003; relative reduction: 28.2%; 95% CI, 13.0% to 43.4%). In placebo-treated participants, the daily CS least-squares mean was 0.32 in the subgroup with baseline timothy grass–specific serum IgE of less than 0.1 kU/L (n = 23) and 0.46 in those with baseline timothy grass–specific serum IgE of 0.1 kU/L or greater (n = 204). The most frequent reported adverse events were oral pruritus, throat irritation, and nasopharyngitis. There were no reports of anaphylaxis, and no actively treated participant received epinephrine. In US adults with grass pollen–induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, preseasonal and coseasonal treatment with 300IR 5-grass pollen sublingual tablet demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy, especially in study subjects with measurable timothy grass–specific serum IgE. Use of 300IR 5-grass pollen sublingual tablet was safe and well tolerated. A requirement for a measurable level of allergen-specific serum IgE should be considered in future studies in this field.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0091-6749
1097-6825
1097-6825
DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2012.08.032