Specialized heart failure clinics versus primary care: Extended registry-based follow-up of the NorthStar trial

Whether continued follow-up in specialized heart failure (HF) clinics after optimization of guideline-directed therapy improves long-term outcomes in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is unknown. 921 medically optimized HFrEF patients enrolled in the NorthStar study were random...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 18; no. 6; p. e0286307
Main Authors Malmborg, Morten, Assad Turky Al-Kahwa, Ali, Kober, Lars, Torp-Pedersen, Christian, Butt, Jawad H, Zahir, Deewa, Tuxen, Christian D, Poulsen, Mikael K, Madelaire, Christian, Fosbol, Emil, Gislason, Gunnar, Hildebrandt, Per, Andersson, Charlotte, Gustafsson, Finn, Schou, Morten
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 08.06.2023
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Whether continued follow-up in specialized heart failure (HF) clinics after optimization of guideline-directed therapy improves long-term outcomes in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is unknown. 921 medically optimized HFrEF patients enrolled in the NorthStar study were randomly assigned to follow up in a specialized HF clinic or primary care and followed for 10 years using Danish nationwide registries. The primary outcome was a composite of HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death. We further assessed the 5-year adherence to prescribed neurohormonal blockade in 5-year survivors. At enrollment, the median age was 69 years, 24,7% were females, and the median NT-proBNP was 1139 pg/ml. During a median follow-up time of 4.1 (Q1-Q3 1.5-10.0) years, the primary outcome occurred in 321 patients (69.8%) randomized to follow-up in specialized HF clinics and 325 patients (70.5%) randomized to follow-up in primary care. The rate of the primary outcome, its individual components, and all-cause death did not differ between groups (primary outcome, hazard ratio 0.96 [95% CI, 0.82-1.12]; cardiovascular death, 1.00 [0.81-1.24]; HF hospitalization, 0.97 [0.82-1.14]; all-cause death, 1.00 [0.83-1.20]). In 5-year survivors (N = 660), the 5-year adherence did not differ between groups for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (p = 0.78), beta-blockers (p = 0.74), or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (p = 0.47). HFrEF patients on optimal medical therapy did not benefit from continued follow-up in a specialized HF clinic after initial optimization. Development and implementation of new monitoring strategies are needed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Lars Kober: Speakers honorarium from Novo, Novartis, AstraZeneca and Boehringer. Christian Torp-Pedersen: Grants for studies from Bayer and Novo Nordisk. Finn Gustafsson: Advisor (Bayer, Abbott, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Pfizer, Alnylam, Ionis, Pharmacosmos, Amgen), speakers fee (Orion Pharma, Astra-Zeneca. Morten Schou: lecture fee Novo, Bohringer, Astra, Novo.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0286307