Coaching doctors to improve ethical decision-making in adult hospitalised patients potentially receiving excessive treatment: Study protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 18; no. 3; p. e0281447
• Main Authors: Benoit, Dominique D, Vanheule, Stijn, Manesse, Frank, Anseel, Frederik, De Soete, Geert, Goethals, Katrijn, Lievrouw, An, Vansteelandt, Stijn, De Haan, Erik, Piers, Ruth
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 21.03.2023; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Adult; Attitude of Health Personnel; Biology and Life Sciences; Cancer; Care and treatment; Climate; Clinical trials; Clusters; Data collection; Death & dying; Decision making; Do-not-resuscitate orders; End of life; Ethical aspects; Ethics; Group dynamics; Health aspects; Health risks; Hospital patients; Hospitals; Humans; Laws, regulations and rules; Leadership; Medical care; Medical personnel; Medical research; Medicine and Health Sciences; Medicine, Experimental; Mentoring; Mortality; Nurses; Palliative Care; Palliative treatment; Patients; People and Places; Perceptions; Physicians; Qualitative analysis; Quality management; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Services; Social Sciences; Study Protocol; Surveys and Questionnaires; Teams; Belgium; Netherlands; United States > US; Europe
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281447

Fast medical progress poses a significant challenge to doctors, who are asked to find the right balance between life-prolonging and palliative care. Literature indicates room for enhancing openness to discuss ethical sensitive issues within and between teams, and improving decision-making for benefit of the patient at end-of-life. Stepped wedge cluster randomized trial design, run across 10 different departments of the Ghent University Hospital between January 2022 and January 2023. Dutch speaking adult patients and one of their relatives will be included for data collection. All 10 departments were randomly assigned to start a 4-month coaching period. Junior and senior doctors will be coached through observation and debrief by a first coach of the interdisciplinary meetings and individual coaching by the second coach to enhance self-reflection and empowering leadership and managing group dynamics with regard to ethical decision-making. Nurses, junior doctors and senior doctors anonymously report perceptions of excessive treatment via the electronic patient file. Once a patient is identified by two or more different clinicians, an email is sent to the second coach and the doctor in charge of the patient. All nurses, junior and senior doctors will be invited to fill out the ethical decision making climate questionnaire at the start and end of the 12-months study period. Primary endpoints are (1) incidence of written do-not-intubate and resuscitate orders in patients potentially receiving excessive treatment and (2) quality of ethical decision-making climate. Secondary endpoints are patient and family well-being and reports on quality of care and communication; and clinician well-being. Tertiairy endpoints are quantitative and qualitative data of doctor leadership quality. This is the first randomized control trial exploring the effects of coaching doctors in self-reflection and empowering leadership, and in the management of team dynamics, with regard to ethical decision-making about patients potentially receiving excessive treatment.