Redistribution spurs growth by using a portfolio effect on risky human capital

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 8; no. 2; p. e54904
• Main Authors: Lorenz, Jan, Paetzel, Fabian, Schweitzer, Frank
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 04.02.2013; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Computer simulation; Computer-generated environments; Cooperation; Costs; Economic analysis; Economic models; Efficiency; Endowment; Environmental aspects; Financing, Government - organization & administration; Financing, Government - statistics & numerical data; Government; Human capital; Humans; Income; Income Tax - economics; Income Tax - statistics & numerical data; Inequality; Mathematical analysis; Mathematical models; Mathematics; Models, Economic; Physics; Population; Population Dynamics - trends; Public Policy - economics; Risk taking; Social and Behavioral Sciences; Society; Socioeconomic Factors; Statistical mechanics; Stochastic processes; Stochasticity; Sustainability; Sustainable development; Systems design; Tax rates; Taxation; Theory; Wealth distribution; Germany; Switzerland
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054904

We demonstrate by mathematical analysis and systematic computer simulations that redistribution can lead to sustainable growth in a society. In accordance with economic models of risky human capital, we assume that dynamics of human capital is modeled as a multiplicative stochastic process which, in the long run, leads to the destruction of individual human capital. When agents are linked by fully redistributive taxation the situation might turn to individual growth in the long run. We consider that a government collects a proportion of income and reduces it by a fraction as costs for administration (efficiency losses). The remaining public good is equally redistributed to all agents. Sustainable growth is induced by redistribution despite the losses from the random growth process and despite administrative costs. Growth results from a portfolio effect. The findings are verified for three different tax schemes: proportional tax, taking proportionally more from the rich, and proportionally more from the poor. We discuss which of these tax schemes performs better with respect to maximize growth under a fixed rate of administrative costs, and the governmental income. This leads us to general conclusions about governmental decisions, the relation to public good games with free riding, and the function of taxation in a risk-taking society.