The palatability of sugar-sweetened beverage taxation: A content analysis of newspaper coverage of the UK sugar debate

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 13; no. 12; p. e0207576
• Main Authors: Buckton, Christina H, Patterson, Chris, Hyseni, Lirije, Katikireddi, S Vittal, Lloyd-Williams, Ffion, Elliott-Green, Alex, Capewell, Simon, Hilton, Shona
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 05.12.2018; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Advocacy; Alcohol; American newspapers; Analysis; Beverage industry; Beverages; Biology and Life Sciences; Carbonated Beverages - economics; Communication; Consumer Advocacy - economics; Consumption; Content analysis; Debates; Dietary Sucrose; Echoes; Food; Future; Health risks; Health sciences; Humans; International economic relations; Mass media; Mass Media - trends; Mass media effects; Media coverage; Medicine and Health Sciences; News media; Obesity; Palatability; Policy making; Public health; Public Health - methods; Public Policy - legislation & jurisprudence; Public Policy - trends; Qualitative research; Research and Analysis Methods; Social Sciences; Soft drink industry; Soft drinks; State intervention; Sugar; Sugars - economics; Taxation; Taxes - economics; Taxes - legislation & jurisprudence; Tobacco; Type 2 diabetes; United Kingdom; Young adults; Youth; United Kingdom; United Kingdom > UK; England
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207576

Excess sugar consumption, including sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), contributes to a variety of negative health outcomes, particularly for young people. The mass media play a powerful role in influencing public and policy-makers' perceptions of public health issues and their solutions. We analysed how sugar and SSB policy debates were presented in UK newspapers at a time of heightened awareness and following the announcement of the UK Government's soft drinks industry levy (SDIL), to inform future public health advocacy. We carried out quantitative content analysis of articles discussing the issues of sugar and SSB consumption published in 11 national newspapers from April 2015 to November 2016. 684 newspaper articles were analysed using a structured coding frame. Coverage peaked in line with evidence publication, campaigner activities and policy events. Articles predominantly supportive of SSB taxation (23.5%) outnumbered those that were predominantly oppositional (14.2%). However, oppositional articles outnumbered supportive ones in the month of the announcement of the SDIL. Sugar and SSB consumption were presented as health risks, particularly affecting young people, with the actions of industry often identified as the cause of the public health problem. Responsibility for addressing sugar overconsumption was primarily assigned to government intervention. Our results suggest that the policy landscape favouring fiscal solutions to curb sugar and SSB consumption has benefited from media coverage characterising the issue as an industry-driven problem. Media coverage may drive greater public acceptance of the SDIL and any future taxation of products containing sugar. However, future advocacy efforts should note the surge in opposition coinciding with the announcement of the SDIL, which echoes similar patterns of opposition observed in tobacco control debates.