Quality Control of Motor Unit Number Index (MUNIX) Measurements in 6 Muscles in a Single-Subject “Round-Robin” Setup

Motor Unit Number Index (MUNIX) is a neurophysiological measure that provides an index of the number of lower motor neurons in a muscle. Its performance across centres in healthy subjects and patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) has been established, but inter-rater variability between...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 11; no. 5; p. e0153948
Main Authors Neuwirth, Christoph, Burkhardt, Christian, Alix, James, Castro, José, de Carvalho, Mamede, Gawel, Malgorzata, Goedee, Stephan, Grosskreutz, Julian, Lenglet, Timothée, Moglia, Cristina, Omer, Taha, Schrooten, Maarten, Weber, Markus
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 02.05.2016
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Motor Unit Number Index (MUNIX) is a neurophysiological measure that provides an index of the number of lower motor neurons in a muscle. Its performance across centres in healthy subjects and patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) has been established, but inter-rater variability between multiple raters in one single subject has not been investigated. To assess reliability in a set of 6 muscles in a single subject among 12 examiners (6 experienced with MUNIX, 6 less experienced) and to determine variables associated with variability of measurements. Twelve raters applied MUNIX in six different muscles (abductor pollicis brevis (APB), abductor digiti minimi (ADM), biceps brachii (BB), tibialis anterior (TA), extensor dig. brevis (EDB), abductor hallucis (AH)) twice in one single volunteer on consecutive days. All raters visited at least one training course prior to measurements. Intra- and inter-rater variability as determined by the coefficient of variation (COV) between different raters and their levels of experience with MUNIX were compared. Mean intra-rater COV of MUNIX was 14.0% (±6.4) ranging from 5.8 (APB) to 30.3% (EDB). Mean inter-rater COV was 18.1 (±5.4) ranging from 8.0 (BB) to 31.7 (AH). No significant differences of variability between experienced and less experienced raters were detected. We provide evidence that quality control for neurophysiological methods can be performed with similar standards as in laboratory medicine. Intra- and inter-rater variability of MUNIX is muscle-dependent and mainly below 20%. Experienced neurophysiologists can easily adopt MUNIX and adequate teaching ensures reliable utilization of this method.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Conceived and designed the experiments: CN MW CB. Performed the experiments: CN MW CB JA JC MdC MG SG JG TL CM TO MS. Analyzed the data: CN MW CB MdC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: CN MW CB. Wrote the paper: CN MW CB JA JC MdC MG SG JG TL CM TO MS.
Competing Interests: CN and MW received honoraria from Hänseler AG, Switzerland, and Biogen, USA, as advisory board members. MW received advisory board honoraria from Merz Pharma, Switzerland. TL is consulting for LFB Biomédicaments, France. This does not alter the authors' adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. The other authors have declared they have no competing interests.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0153948