Sharing, reuse, and storage of biosamples among biomedical researchers in Jordan: Practice and concerns

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 17; no. 4; p. e0267552
• Main Authors: Alkaraki, Almuthanna K., Khabour, Omar F., Alzoubi, Karem H., Al-Ebbini, Lina M. K., Altaany, Zaid
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 28.04.2022; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Attitude; Biobanks; Biomedical Research; Confidentiality; Consent; Cross-Sectional Studies; Ethical standards; Ethics; Evaluation; Human subjects; Humans; Jordan; Male; Medical laboratories; Medical research; Medicine and Health Sciences; Medicine, Experimental; People and Places; Pharmacy; Polls & surveys; Privacy; Public health; Questionnaires; Research and Analysis Methods; Research ethics; Research Personnel; Researchers; Reuse; Safety and security measures; Sample size; Science Policy; Scientific papers; Social Sciences; Statistical analysis; Storage; Jordan
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267552

Sharing and reuse biosamples can facilitate biomedical research. Little is known about researchers' perception and practice about sharing, reusing, and storing biosamples in Jordan. Therefore, the current study aimed to evaluate the practices of biomedical researchers in Jordan regarding biosamples management. The study was cross-sectional and involved biomedical researchers from different parts of Jordan. A questionnaire was designed to achieve the aim of this study. The questionnaire was web-based and distributed via e-mails using Google forms. Opinions of Jordanian biomedical researchers from different academic ranks and institutional backgrounds were measured and recorded anonymously. The majority of the sample was males (57.9%), from public universities (64.3%), and (64.6%) were from health-related fields. About 82.9% of participants stored biosamples using codes, whereas the rest used the subject's name. Sharing of biosamples was commonly practiced by 61.7% of Jordanian researchers locally, while 47.2% of the Jordanian researchers shared biosamples overseas. The reuse of biosamples in other projects was reported to be 55.4%. The majority explained the possibility of reusing and sharing biosamples in the consent form (range: 53-58%). Sharing and reusing biosamples were associated with gender, the number of publications in peer-reviewed international journals, and academic rank (P<0.05). Sharing and reusing biosamples are common among Jordanian biomedical researchers. Therefore, ethically grounded biosamples sharing and reuse standards are essential for protecting human subjects' rights and privacy in Jordan.