A head and neck cancer tumor response-specific gene signature for cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil induction chemotherapy fails with added taxanes

It is a major clinical challenge to predict which patients, with advanced stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, will not exhibit a reduction in tumor size following induction chemotherapy in order to avoid toxic effects of ineffective chemotherapy and delays for instituting other therapeutic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 7; no. 10; p. e47170
Main Authors Tomkiewicz, Céline, Hans, Stéphane, Mucchielli, Marie Hélène, Agier, Nicolas, Delacroix, Hervé, Marisa, Laetitia, Brasnu, Daniel, Aggerbeck, Lawrence P, Badoual, Cécile, Barouki, Robert, Aggerbeck, Martine
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 09.10.2012
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:It is a major clinical challenge to predict which patients, with advanced stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, will not exhibit a reduction in tumor size following induction chemotherapy in order to avoid toxic effects of ineffective chemotherapy and delays for instituting other therapeutic options. Further, it is of interest to know to what extent a gene signature, which identifies patients with tumors that will not respond to a particular induction chemotherapy, is applicable when additional chemotherapeutic agents are added to the regimen. To identify genes that predict tumor resistance to induction with cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (PF) or PF and a taxane, we analyzed patient tumor biopsies with whole genome microarrays and quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR (TLDA) cards. A leave one out cross-validation procedure allowed evaluation of the prediction tool. A ten-gene microarray signature correctly classified 12/13 responders and 7/10 non-responders to PF (92% specificity, 82.6% accuracy). TLDA analysis (using the same classifier) of the patients correctly classified 12/12 responders and 8/10 non-responders (100% specificity, 90.9% accuracy). Further, TLDA analysis correctly predicted the response of 5 new patients and, overall, 12/12 responders and 13/15 non-responders (100% specificity, 92.6% accuracy). The protein products of the genes constituting the signature physically associate with 27 other proteins, involved in regulating gene expression, constituting an interaction network. In contrast, TLDA-based prediction (with the same gene signature) of responses to induction with PF and either of two taxanes was poor (0% specificity, 25% accuracy and 33.3% specificity, 25% accuracy). Successful transfer of the microarray-based gene signature to an independent, PCR-based technology suggests that TLDA-based signatures could be a useful hospital-based technology for determining therapeutic options. Although highly specific for tumor responses to PF induction, the gene signature is unsuccessful when taxanes are added. The results illustrate the subtlety in developing "personalized medicine".
Bibliography:Current address: Programme Cartes d'Identité des Tumeurs (CIT), Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, Paris, France
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Conceived and designed the experiments: DB LPA RB MA. Performed the experiments: CT SH MHM NA LM CB MA. Analyzed the data: CT MHM HD LM LPA MA. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: CT SH MHM NA HD LM LPA MA. Wrote the paper: CT MHM LPA MA RB SH DB HD LM CB.
Current address: Centre de Génétique Moléculaire, UPR 3404, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Current address: UMR7238, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0047170