The Effect of Visual Representation Style in Problem-Solving: A Perspective from Cognitive Processes

Using results from a controlled experiment and simulations based on cognitive models, we show that visual presentation style can have a significant impact on performance in a complex problem-solving task. We compared subject performances in two isomorphic, but visually different, tasks based on a ca...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 8; no. 11; p. e80550
Main Authors Nyamsuren, Enkhbold, Taatgen, Niels A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 15.11.2013
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0080550

Cover

More Information
Summary:Using results from a controlled experiment and simulations based on cognitive models, we show that visual presentation style can have a significant impact on performance in a complex problem-solving task. We compared subject performances in two isomorphic, but visually different, tasks based on a card game of SET. Although subjects used the same strategy in both tasks, the difference in presentation style resulted in radically different reaction times and significant deviations in scanpath patterns in the two tasks. Results from our study indicate that low-level subconscious visual processes, such as differential acuity in peripheral vision and low-level iconic memory, can have indirect, but significant effects on decision making during a problem-solving task. We have developed two ACT-R models that employ the same basic strategy but deal with different presentations styles. Our ACT-R models confirm that changes in low-level visual processes triggered by changes in presentation style can propagate to higher-level cognitive processes. Such a domino effect can significantly affect reaction times and eye movements, without affecting the overall strategy of problem solving.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Conceived and designed the experiments: EN NAT. Performed the experiments: EN. Analyzed the data: EN NAT. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: EN. Wrote the manuscript: EN NAT. Overall supervision of research progress and quality: NAT.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0080550