Repeated Witnessing of Conspecifics in Pain: Effects on Emotional Contagion

Witnessing of conspecifics in pain has been shown to elicit socially triggered freezing in rodents. It is unknown how robust this response is to repeated exposure to a cage-mate experiencing painful stimulation. To address this question, shock-experienced Observer rats repeatedly witnessed familiar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 10; no. 9; p. e0136979
Main Authors Carrillo, Maria, Migliorati, Filippo, Bruls, Rune, Han, Yingying, Heinemans, Mirjam, Pruis, Ilanah, Gazzola, Valeria, Keysers, Christian
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 10.09.2015
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Witnessing of conspecifics in pain has been shown to elicit socially triggered freezing in rodents. It is unknown how robust this response is to repeated exposure to a cage-mate experiencing painful stimulation. To address this question, shock-experienced Observer rats repeatedly witnessed familiar Demonstrators receive painful footshocks (six sessions). Results confirm that Observers freeze during the first testing session. The occurrence of this behaviour however gradually diminished as the experimental sessions progressed, reaching minimal freezing levels by the end of the experiments. In contrast, the appearance and continuous increase in the frequency of yawning, a behavior that was inhibited by metyrapone (i.e,. a glucocorticoid synthesis blocker), might represent an alternative coping strategy, suggesting that the observer's reduced freezing does not necessarily indicate a disappearance in the affective response to the Demonstrator's distress.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
YH, MH, and IP also contributed equally to this work. VG and CK also contributed equally to this work.
Conceived and designed the experiments: MC FM VG CK. Performed the experiments: MC FM RB IP MH YH. Analyzed the data: MC FM RB IP MH. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MC FM. Wrote the paper: MC FM VG CK.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0136979