Evaluation of epidemiological cut-off values indicates that biocide resistant subpopulations are uncommon in natural isolates of clinically-relevant microorganisms

To date there are no clear criteria to determine whether a microbe is susceptible to biocides or not. As a starting point for distinguishing between wild-type and resistant organisms, we set out to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) dist...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 9; no. 1; p. e86669
Main Authors Morrissey, Ian, Oggioni, Marco Rinaldo, Knight, Daniel, Curiao, Tania, Coque, Teresa, Kalkanci, Ayse, Martinez, Jose Luis
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 23.01.2014
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To date there are no clear criteria to determine whether a microbe is susceptible to biocides or not. As a starting point for distinguishing between wild-type and resistant organisms, we set out to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) distributions for four common biocides; triclosan, benzalkonium chloride, chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite for 3319 clinical isolates, with a particular focus on Staphylococcus aureus (N = 1635) and Salmonella spp. (N = 901) but also including Escherichia coli (N = 368), Candida albicans (N = 200), Klebsiella pneumoniae (N = 60), Enterobacter spp. (N = 54), Enterococcus faecium (N = 53), and Enterococcus faecalis (N = 56). From these data epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) are proposed. As would be expected, MBCs were higher than MICs for all biocides. In most cases both values followed a normal distribution. Bimodal distributions, indicating the existence of biocide resistant subpopulations were observed for Enterobacter chlorhexidine susceptibility (both MICs and MBCs) and the susceptibility to triclosan of Enterobacter (MBC), E. coli (MBC and MIC) and S. aureus (MBC and MIC). There is a concern on the potential selection of antibiotic resistance by biocides. Our results indicate however that resistance to biocides and, hence any potential association with antibiotic resistance, is uncommon in natural populations of clinically relevant microorganisms.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
Current address: Dept. of Genetics, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
Current address: The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
Current address: IHMA Europe Sàrl, Epalinges, Switzerland
Membership of the BIOHYPO Consortium is provided in the Acknowledgments.
Competing Interests: IM and DK were employees of Quotient Bioresearch at the time of the study. From the BIOHYPO Consortium: HJR is an employee of Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann GmbH, PV is an employee of Biolab Española, and ME is an employee of Advanced Analytical Technologies. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products to declare concerning the current article. This does not alter the authors’ adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Conceived and designed the experiments: IM MRO T. Coque AK JLM. Performed the experiments: DK T. Curiao AK. Analyzed the data: IM MRO DK T. Curiao T. Coque AK JLM. Wrote the paper: IM MRO T. Coque AK JLM.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0086669