Performance of custom made videolaryngoscope for endotracheal intubation: A systematic review

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 17; no. 1; p. e0261863
• Main Authors: Hamal, Pawan Kumar, Yadav, Rupesh Kumar, Malla, Pragya
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 06.01.2022; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Anesthesiology; Bias; Biology and Life Sciences; Clinical trials; Colposcopes; Cross-sectional studies; Customization; Design and construction; Endoscopes; Gastroscopes; Health risks; Humans; Injury analysis; Injury prevention; Intensive care; Intervention; Intubation; Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation; Intubation, Intratracheal - methods; Laryngoscopes; Laryngoscopy; Laryngoscopy - instrumentation; Laryngoscopy - methods; Laryngostroboscope; Low income areas; Medical instruments; Medical research; Medicine and Health Sciences; Medicine, Experimental; Observational studies; Physical Sciences; Quality assessment; Quality control; Research and Analysis Methods; Respiratory tract; Risk analysis; Search engines; Search strategies; Success; Supervision; Systematic review; Trachea; Trauma; Nepal
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261863

Videolaryngoscope is regarded as the standard of care for airway management in well-resourced setups however the technology is largely inaccessible and costly in middle and low-income countries. An improvised and cost-effective form of customized videolaryngoscope was proposed and studied for patient care in underprivileged areas however there were no distinct conclusions on its performances. The study follows PRISMA guidelines for systematic review and the protocol in International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews. The primary aim was to assess the first attempt success of customized videolaryngoscope for endotracheal intubation. The secondary objective was to evaluate the number of attempts, laryngoscopic view in terms of Cormack Lehane score and Percentage of glottic opening, use of external laryngeal maneuver and stylet and, the airway injuries after the endotracheal intubation. Five studies were analyzed for risk of bias using the National Institute of Health Quality Assessment Tool for cross-sectional studies. Most of the studies had a poor to a fair level of evidence with only one study with a good level of evidence. Certainty of evidence was "very low" for all eligible studies when graded using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach for systematic review. The certainty of the evidence regarding performance of custom-made videolaryngoscope compared to conventional laryngoscope was very low and the study was performed in small numbers with fair to the poor risk of bias. It was difficult to establish and do further analysis regarding whether the customized form of videolaryngoscope will improve the first attempt success rate for tracheal intubation, reduce the number of attempts, improve the laryngoscopic view, require fewer external aids and reduce the incidences of airway injury with the given low-grade evidence. Some properly conducted randomised clinical trials will be required to further analyze the outcome and make the strong recommendations.