One Giant Leap for Categorizers: One Small Step for Categorization Theory

We explore humans' rule-based category learning using analytic approaches that highlight their psychological transitions during learning. These approaches confirm that humans show qualitatively sudden psychological transitions during rule learning. These transitions contribute to the theoretica...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 10; no. 9; p. e0137334
Main Authors Smith, J David, Ell, Shawn W
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 02.09.2015
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We explore humans' rule-based category learning using analytic approaches that highlight their psychological transitions during learning. These approaches confirm that humans show qualitatively sudden psychological transitions during rule learning. These transitions contribute to the theoretical literature contrasting single vs. multiple category-learning systems, because they seem to reveal a distinctive learning process of explicit rule discovery. A complete psychology of categorization must describe this learning process, too. Yet extensive formal-modeling analyses confirm that a wide range of current (gradient-descent) models cannot reproduce these transitions, including influential rule-based models (e.g., COVIS) and exemplar models (e.g., ALCOVE). It is an important theoretical conclusion that existing models cannot explain humans' rule-based category learning. The problem these models have is the incremental algorithm by which learning is simulated. Humans descend no gradient in rule-based tasks. Very different formal-modeling systems will be required to explain humans' psychology in these tasks. An important next step will be to build a new generation of models that can do so.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Conceived and designed the experiments: JDS SWE. Performed the experiments: JDS SWE. Analyzed the data: JDS SWE. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JDS SWE. Wrote the paper: JDS SWE. Conducted formal modeling: JDS SWE.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0137334