Timelines of translational science: From technology initiation to FDA approval

While timelines for clinical development have been extensively studied, there is little data on the broader path from initiation of research on novel drug targets, to approval of drugs based on this research. We examined timelines of translational science for 138 drugs and biologicals approved by th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 12; no. 5; p. e0177371
Main Authors McNamee, Laura M, Walsh, Michael Jay, Ledley, Fred D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 08.05.2017
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:While timelines for clinical development have been extensively studied, there is little data on the broader path from initiation of research on novel drug targets, to approval of drugs based on this research. We examined timelines of translational science for 138 drugs and biologicals approved by the FDA from 2010-2014 using an analytical model of technology maturation. Research on targets for 102 products exhibited a characteristic (S-curve) maturation pattern with exponential growth between statistically defined technology initiation and established points. The median initiation was 1974, with a median of 25 years to the established point, 28 years to first clinical trials, and 36 years to FDA approval. No products were approved before the established point, and development timelines were significantly longer when the clinical trials began before this point (11.5 vs 8.5 years, p<0.0005). Technological maturation represents the longest stage of translation, and significantly impacts the efficiency of drug development.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Conceptualization: LMM FDL.Data curation: LMM.Formal analysis: LMM MJW FDL.Funding acquisition: FDL.Investigation: LMM FDL.Methodology: LMM MJW FDL.Project administration: LMM.Supervision: LMM FDL.Validation: LMM MJW FDL.Writing – original draft: LMM FDL.Writing – review & editing: LMM FDL.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0177371