Evidence against a relation between bilingualism and creativity

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 15; no. 6; p. e0234928
• Main Authors: Lange, Kendra V, Hopman, Elise W M, Zemla, Jeffrey C, Austerweil, Joseph L
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 24.06.2020; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Advantages; Bayesian analysis; Bilingualism; Biology and Life Sciences; Cognition & reasoning; Computer and Information Sciences; Creativity; Estimation; Executive function; Female; Fluency; Humans; Hypotheses; Individual differences; Knowledge; Knowledge representation; Language; Language acquisition; Male; Models, Theoretical; Monolingualism; Multilingualism; Networks; Null hypothesis; Physical Sciences; Psychological research; Psychologists; Researchers; Second language learning; Semantics; Social Sciences; Verbal tasks; Young Adult; United States; United States > US
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234928

Are bilinguals more creative than monolinguals? Some prior research suggests bilinguals are more creative because the knowledge representations for their second language are similarly structured to those of highly creative people. However, there is contrasting research showing that the knowledge representations of bilinguals' second language are actually structured like those of less creative people. Finally, there is growing skepticism about there being differences between bilinguals and monolinguals on non-language tasks (e.g., the bilingual advantage for executive control). We tested whether bilinguals tested in their second language are more or less creative than both monolinguals and bilinguals tested in their first language. Participants also took a repeated semantic fluency test that we used to estimate individual semantic networks for each participant. We analyzed our results with Bayesian statistics and found support for the null hypothesis that bilingualism offers no advantage for creativity. Further, using best practices for estimating semantic networks, we found support for the hypothesis that there is no association between an individual's semantic network and their creativity. This is in contrast with published research, and suggests that some of those findings may have been the result of idiosyncrasies, outdated methods for estimating semantic networks, or statistical noise. Our results call into question reported relations between bilingualism and creativity, as well as semantic network structure as an explanatory mechanism for individual differences in creativity.