Ureter regeneration-the proper scaffold has to be defined

The aim of this study was to compare two different acellular scaffolds: natural and synthetic, for urinary conduit construction and ureter segment reconstruction. Acellular aortic arch (AAM) and poly(L-lactide-co-caprolactone) (PLCL) were used in 24 rats for ureter reconstruction in both tested grou...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 9; no. 8; p. e106023
Main Authors Kloskowski, Tomasz, Jundziłł, Arkadiusz, Kowalczyk, Tomasz, Nowacki, Maciej, Bodnar, Magdalena, Marszałek, Andrzej, Pokrywczyńska, Marta, Frontczak-Baniewicz, Małgorzata, Kowalewski, Tomasz A, Chłosta, Piotr, Drewa, Tomasz
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 27.08.2014
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The aim of this study was to compare two different acellular scaffolds: natural and synthetic, for urinary conduit construction and ureter segment reconstruction. Acellular aortic arch (AAM) and poly(L-lactide-co-caprolactone) (PLCL) were used in 24 rats for ureter reconstruction in both tested groups. Follow-up period was 4 weeks. Intravenous pyelography, histological and immunohistochemical analysis were performed. All animals survived surgical procedures. Patent uretero-conduit junction was observed only in one case using PLCL. In case of ureter segment reconstruction ureters were patent in one case using AAM and in four cases using PLCL scaffolds. Regeneration of urothelium layer and focal regeneration of smooth muscle layer was observed on both tested scaffolds. Obtained results indicates that synthetic acellular PLCL scaffolds showed better properties for ureter reconstruction than naturally derived acellular aortic arch.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Conceived and designed the experiments: T. Kloskowski AJ T. Kowalczyk MN MB AM MP T. Kowalewski PC TD. Performed the experiments: T. Kloskowski AJ T. Kowalczyk MN MB MF-B. Analyzed the data: MP TD AM T. Kowalewski MF-B. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: T. Kloskowski AJ T. Kowalczyk MB MN MP. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: T. Kloskowski MN T. Kowalczyk MP TD.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0106023