Feasibility of wireless continuous monitoring of vital signs without using alarms on a general surgical ward: A mixed methods study

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 17; no. 3; p. e0265435
• Main Authors: Leenen, Jobbe P L, Rasing, Henriëtte J M, van Dijk, Joris D, Kalkman, Cor J, Schoonhoven, Lisette, Patijn, Gijs A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 14.03.2022; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Alarms; Biosensors; Clinical Alarms; Complications; Engineering and Technology; False alarms; Fatigue; Feasibility; Feasibility Studies; Focus groups; Health aspects; Health sciences; Heart rate; Hospitals; Humans; Medical personnel; Medicine and Health Sciences; Methods; Mixed methods research; Monitoring; Monitoring systems; Monitoring, Physiologic - methods; Mortality; Nurses; Nursing; Patient monitoring; Patients; Patients' Rooms; People and Places; Physicians; Professional ethics; Research and Analysis Methods; Respiration; Respiratory rate; Shift work; Surgery; Telemedicine; Tertiary; Trend analysis; Trends; Vital signs; Vital Signs - physiology; Wearable Electronic Devices; Wearable technology; United Kingdom; Netherlands
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265435

Wireless continuous vital sign monitoring by wearable devices have recently become available for patients on general wards to promote timely detection of clinical deterioration. Many continuous monitoring systems use conventional threshold alarm settings to alert nurses in case of deviating vital signs. However, frequent false alarms often lead to alarm fatigue and inefficiencies in the workplace. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of continuous vital sign monitoring without the use of alarms, thereby exclusively relying on interval trend monitoring. This explanatory sequential mixed methods study was conducted at an abdominal surgical ward of a tertiary teaching hospital. Heart rate and respiratory rate of patients were measured every minute by a wearable sensor. Trends were visualized and assessed six times per day by nurses and once a day by doctors during morning rounds. Instead of using alarms we focused exclusively on regular vital sign trend analysis by nurses and doctors. Primary outcome was feasibility in terms of acceptability by professionals, assessed by the Usefulness, Satisfaction and Ease of Use questionnaire and further explored in two focus groups, as well as fidelity. A total of 56 patients were monitored and in 80.5% (n = 536) of nurses' work shifts the trends assessments were documented. All deviating trends (n = 17) were recognized in time. Professionals (N = 46) considered continuous monitoring satisfying (4.8±1.0 on a 1-7 Likert-scale) and were willing to use the technology. Although insight into vital sign trends allowed faster anticipation and action upon changed patient status, professionals were neutral about usefulness (4.4±1.0). They found continuous monitoring easy to use (4.7±0.8) and easy to learn (5.3±1.0) but indicated the need for gaining practical experience. Nurses considered the use of alarms for deviating vital signs unnecessary, when trends were regularly assessed and reported. We demonstrated that continuous vital signs trend monitoring without using alarms was feasible in the general ward setting, thereby avoiding unnecessary alarms and preventing alarm fatigue. When monitoring in a general ward setting, the standard use of alarms may therefore be reconsidered.