Use of Powered Prosthesis for Children with Upper Limb Deficiency at Hyogo Rehabilitation Center

There has been no research investigating the use of powered prosthetic for children in Japan. To gain better insight into the state of powered prosthesis usage and identify a ratio of rejection among children. Subjects were 37 unilateral below elbow amputees between the ages of 0 and 16 at the time...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 10; no. 6; p. e0131746
Main Authors Toda, Mitsunori, Chin, Takaaki, Shibata, Yaeko, Mizobe, Futoshi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 30.06.2015
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0131746

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:There has been no research investigating the use of powered prosthetic for children in Japan. To gain better insight into the state of powered prosthesis usage and identify a ratio of rejection among children. Subjects were 37 unilateral below elbow amputees between the ages of 0 and 16 at the time of their first experienced fitting with a powered prosthesis at our Center. The information was collected from medical records and through face-to-face interviews, and we examined rejection rate and the factors affecting the use of powered prosthesis. The rate of discontinuation was 21.6% as 8 of the 37 children stopped using powered prosthesis. All of them were fitted their prosthesis after 2 years of age, and they rejected prosthesis between 5 to 19 years. We found that the level of amputation had no influence on the use of a powered prosthesis. Children fitted before 2 years of age tend to accept their powered prosthesis than those fitted after 2 years. Multidisciprinary team approach, adequate rehabilitation, detailed follow-up and involvement of parents are quite important for introducing powered prosthesis for children.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
These authors also contributed equally to this work.
Conceived and designed the experiments: TC. Performed the experiments: YS FM MT. Analyzed the data: MT. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MT YS. Wrote the paper: TC MT.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0131746