Media Coverage, Journal Press Releases and Editorials Associated with Randomized and Observational Studies in High-Impact Medical Journals: A Cohort Study

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 10; no. 12; p. e0145294
• Main Authors: Wang, Michael T. M., Bolland, Mark J., Gamble, Greg, Grey, Andrew
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 23.12.2015; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Attitude to Health; Biomarkers; Clinical medicine; Clinical trials; Cohort Studies; Editorials; Influence; Internal medicine; Journal Impact Factor; Mass Media; Media coverage; Medical journals; Medical research; Medicine; Mortality; News media; Observational studies; Observational Studies as Topic; Randomization; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Research Design; Studies; New Zealand; United States > US
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145294

Publication of clinical research findings in prominent journals influences health beliefs and medical practice, in part by engendering news coverage. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) should be most influential in guiding clinical practice. We determined whether study design of clinical research published in high-impact journals influences media coverage. We compared the incidence and amount of media coverage of RCTs with that of observational studies published in the top 7 medical journals between 1 January 2013 and 31 March 2013. We specifically assessed media coverage of the most rigorous RCTs, those with >1000 participants that reported 'hard' outcomes. There was no difference between RCTs and observational studies in coverage by major newspapers or news agencies, or in total number of news stories generated (all P>0.63). Large RCTs reporting 'hard' outcomes did not generate more news coverage than small RCTs that reported surrogate outcomes and observational studies (all P>0.32). RCTs were more likely than observational studies to attract a journal editorial (70% vs 46%, P = 0.003), but less likely to be the subject of a journal press release (17% vs 50%, P<0.001). Large RCTs that reported 'hard' outcomes did not attract an editorial more frequently than other studies (61% vs 58%, P>0.99), nor were they more likely to be the subject of a journal press release (14% vs 38%, P = 0.14). The design of clinical studies whose results are published in high-impact medical journals is not associated with the likelihood or amount of ensuing news coverage.