Development of a national quality framework for palliative care in a mixed generalist and specialist care model: A whole-sector approach and a modified Delphi technique

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 17; no. 3; p. e0265726
• Main Authors: Boddaert, Manon S, Douma, Joep, Dijxhoorn, Anne-Floor Q, Héman, René A C L, van der Rijt, Carin C D, Teunissen, Saskia S C M, Huijgens, Peter C, Vissers, Kris C P
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 23.03.2022; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Aged; Cancer; Consensus; COVID-19; Delphi method; Delphi Technique; Health care; Health Personnel; Hospice care; Humans; Literature reviews; Medical personnel; Medicine and Health Sciences; Methods; Modelling; Nursing; Oncology; Pain; Palliation; Palliative Care; Palliative treatment; Patients; People and places; Physicians; Practice; Primary care; Professionals; Quality of Health Care; Quality of life; Research and Analysis Methods; Society; Stakeholders; Supervision; Surveying; Netherlands
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265726

In a predominantly biomedical healthcare model focused on cure, providing optimal, person-centred palliative care is challenging. The general public, patients, and healthcare professionals are often unaware of palliative care's benefits. Poor interdisciplinary teamwork and limited communication combined with a lack of early identification of patients with palliative care needs contribute to sub-optimal palliative care provision. We aimed to develop a national quality framework to improve availability and access to high-quality palliative care in a mixed generalist-specialist palliative care model. We hypothesised that a whole-sector approach and a modified Delphi technique would be suitable to reach this aim. Analogous to the international AGREE guideline criteria and employing a whole-sector approach, an expert panel comprising mandated representatives for patients and their families, various healthcare associations, and health insurers answered the main question: 'What are the elements defining high-quality palliative care in the Netherlands?'. For constructing the quality framework, a bottleneck analysis of palliative care provision and a literature review were conducted. Six core documents were used in a modified Delphi technique to build the framework with the expert panel, while stakeholder organisations were involved and informed in round-table discussions. In the entire process, preparing and building relationships took one year and surveying, convening, discussing content, consulting peers, and obtaining final consent from all stakeholders took 18 months. A quality framework, including a glossary of terms, endorsed by organisations representing patients and their families, general practitioners, elderly care physicians, medical specialists, nurses, social workers, psychologists, spiritual caregivers, and health insurers was developed and annexed with a summary for patients and families. We successfully developed a national consensus-based patient-centred quality framework for high-quality palliative care in a mixed generalist-specialist palliative care model. A whole-sector approach and a modified Delphi technique are feasible structures to achieve this aim. The process we reported may guide other countries in their initiatives to enhance palliative care.