Improving cost-efficiency of faecal genotyping: New tools for elephant species

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 14; no. 1; p. e0210811
• Main Authors: Bourgeois, Stéphanie, Kaden, Jenny, Senn, Helen, Bunnefeld, Nils, Jeffery, Kathryn J, Akomo-Okoue, Etienne F, Ogden, Rob, McEwing, Ross
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 30.01.2019; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Analysis; Animal behavior; Animals; Assaying; Biology and Life Sciences; Collection; Cost analysis; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Defecation; Deoxyribonucleic acid; DNA; DNA - genetics; DNA - isolation & purification; Dung; Efficiency; Elephants; Elephants - genetics; Endangered populations; Endangered species; Environmental science; Feces; Feces - chemistry; Forensic sciences; Gabon; Genetic aspects; Genetic polymorphisms; Genetic research; Genetic testing; Genotype; Genotyping; Health care costs; Identification; Laboratories; Loxodonta cyclotis; Lysis; Medicine and Health Sciences; Methods; Mitochondrial DNA; Polymerase chain reaction; Polymorphism; Quality; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - economics; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods; Research and Analysis Methods; Sampling; Sampling methods; Single nucleotide polymorphisms; Single-nucleotide polymorphism; Storage; Success; Wildlife; Wildlife conservation; Wildlife management; Zoology; Gabon; United Kingdom > UK; Scotland
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210811

Despite the critical need for non-invasive tools to improve monitoring of wildlife populations, especially for endangered and elusive species, faecal genetic sampling has not been adopted as regular practice, largely because of the associated technical challenges and cost. Substantial work needs to be undertaken to refine sample collection and preparation methods in order to improve sample set quality and provide cost-efficient tools that can effectively support wildlife management. In this study, we collected an extensive set of forest elephant (Loxodonta cyclotis) faecal samples throughout Gabon, Central Africa, and prepared them for genotyping using 107 single-nucleotide polymorphism assays. We developed a new quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay targeting a 130-bp nuclear DNA fragment and demonstrated its suitability for degraded samples in all three elephant species. Using this assay to compare the efficacy of two sampling methods for faecal DNA recovery, we found that sampling the whole surface of a dung pile with a swab stored in a small tube of lysis buffer was a convenient method producing high extraction success and DNA yield. We modelled the influence of faecal quality and storage time on DNA concentration in order to provide recommendations for optimized collection and storage. The maximum storage time to ensure 75% success was two months for samples collected within 24 hours after defecation and extended to four months for samples collected within one hour. Lastly, the real-time quantitative PCR assay allowed us to predict genotyping success and pre-screen DNA samples, thus further increasing the cost-efficiency of our approach. We recommend combining the validation of an efficient sampling method, the build of in-country DNA extraction capacity for reduced storage time and the development of species-specific quantitative PCR assays in order to increase the cost-efficiency of routine non-invasive DNA analyses and expand the use of next-generation markers to non-invasive samples.