Pilots and athletes: Different concerns, similar concussion non-disclosure

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 14; no. 5; p. e0215030
• Main Authors: Foster, Craig A, D'Lauro, Christopher, Johnson, Brian R
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 01.05.2019; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Air forces; Analysis; Athletes; Athletes - psychology; Athletic Injuries - psychology; Attitudes; Behavioral sciences; Biology and Life Sciences; Brain Concussion - epidemiology; Brain Concussion - psychology; Careers; Clinical medicine; Concussion; Cost benefit analysis; Disclosure of information; Female; Health Surveys; Humans; Injuries; Male; Medicine and Health Sciences; Military Personnel - psychology; Neurosciences; Occupational Injuries - psychology; Perceptions; Pilots; Pilots - psychology; Populations; Public health; Reinforcement; Research and Analysis Methods; Self Disclosure; Social aspects; Social behavior; Social interactions; Social Sciences; Social Support; Sports injuries; Sports medicine; United States - epidemiology; United States; United States > US; Colorado
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215030

Concussion non-disclosure research has focused almost exclusively on athletes. The focus on athletic populations has been sensible considering athletes' demonstrated susceptibility to sustaining and concealing concussions. Nevertheless, the habitual use of athletic populations has allowed researchers and practitioners to omit the development of generalized perceived costs and perceived rewards as critical determinants of concussion self-disclosure. We hypothesized that perceiving concussion disclosure as generally more costly than rewarding would predict negative attitudes towards disclosure and decreased intent to disclose. We also hypothesized that generalized perceived costs and rewards could explain concussion non-disclosure in different populations, athletes and future pilots specifically, even when those populations perceive concussion self-disclosure as costly for different specific reasons. We examined concussion disclosure using 2,504 cadets at the United States Air Force Academy. Cadets completed anonymous surveys assessing their intention to self-disclose undiagnosed concussions (Anticipated Concussion Disclosure) as well as several variables potentially related to concussion self-disclosure: perceived cost, perceived reward, personal identity, attitudes, normative behavior, social support, and self-efficacy. The results demonstrate that concussion non-disclosure develops when a population perceives disclosure as more costly (i.e. directly or emotionally) and less rewarding. Perceived Cost and Perceived Reward variables alone accounted for 50% of the variance in Anticipated Conclusion Disclosure (Adjusted R2 = 0.50, F(2,2312) = 1,145.31, p < 0.001). As expected, Anticipated Conclusion Disclosure developed for different reasons within different sub-populations. Consistent with existing research, cadet intercollegiate athletes reported being primarily concerned that concussion self-disclosure would cause them to miss practice or game time (t (736.7) = 14.20, p < .001, Cohen's d = 0.96). In contrast, cadet future pilots reported being primarily concerned that concussion self-disclosure would have negative United States Air Force career repercussions (t (1828) = 10.25, p < .001, Cohen's d = 0.50). These results suggest that cultures of concussion non-disclosure can develop in any population where disclosure is perceived as having undesirable consequences, not just athletic populations. Concussion researchers and practitioners should devote more attention to the perceived cost-benefit structures that create concussion non-disclosure to address this crucial public health issue more effectively.