Advantages and limitations of the use of optogenetic approach in studying fast-scale spike encoding

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 10; no. 4; p. e0122286
• Main Authors: Malyshev, Aleksey, Goz, Roman, LoTurco, Joseph J, Volgushev, Maxim
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 07.04.2015; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Animals; Brain - cytology; Channelrhodopsins; Coding; Computational neuroscience; Computer simulation; Conductance; Controlled conditions; Current injection; Dendrites; Dendrites - metabolism; Dendrites - radiation effects; Electrophysiology; Excitatory postsynaptic potentials; Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials - genetics; Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials - radiation effects; Firing rate; Frequency dependence; Frequency response; Genetic engineering; Genetics; In vivo methods and tests; Information processing; Injection; Kinetics; Light; Light effects; Membrane potential; Mice; Mimicry; Nervous system; Neurobiology; Neurons; Neurons - cytology; Neurons - metabolism; Neurons - radiation effects; Neurosciences; Optics; Optogenetics - methods; Physiology; Plasmids; Potassium; Resistance; Stimuli; Surgery; United States > US; Connecticut; Russia
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122286

Understanding single-neuron computations and encoding performed by spike-generation mechanisms of cortical neurons is one of the central challenges for cell electrophysiology and computational neuroscience. An established paradigm to study spike encoding in controlled conditions in vitro uses intracellular injection of a mixture of signals with fluctuating currents that mimic in vivo-like background activity. However this technique has two serious limitations: it uses current injection, while synaptic activation leads to changes of conductance, and current injection is technically most feasible in the soma, while the vast majority of synaptic inputs are located on the dendrites. Recent progress in optogenetics provides an opportunity to circumvent these limitations. Transgenic expression of light-activated ionic channels, such as Channelrhodopsin2 (ChR2), allows induction of controlled conductance changes even in thin distant dendrites. Here we show that photostimulation provides a useful extension of the tools to study neuronal encoding, but it has its own limitations. Optically induced fluctuating currents have a low cutoff (~70 Hz), thus limiting the dynamic range of frequency response of cortical neurons. This leads to severe underestimation of the ability of neurons to phase-lock their firing to high frequency components of the input. This limitation could be worked around by using short (2 ms) light stimuli which produce membrane potential responses resembling EPSPs by their fast onset and prolonged decay kinetics. We show that combining application of short light stimuli to different parts of dendritic tree for mimicking distant EPSCs with somatic injection of fluctuating current that mimics fluctuations of membrane potential in vivo, allowed us to study fast encoding of artificial EPSPs photoinduced at different distances from the soma. We conclude that dendritic photostimulation of ChR2 with short light pulses provides a powerful tool to investigate population encoding of simulated synaptic potentials generated in dendrites at different distances from the soma.