Validation of glomerular filtration rate-estimating equations in Chinese children

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 12; no. 7; p. e0180565
• Main Authors: Zheng, Ke, Gong, Mengchun, Qin, Yan, Song, Hongmei, Shi, Ximin, Wu, Yuan, Li, Fang, Li, Xuemei
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 06.07.2017; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Adolescent; Analysis; Bias; Biology and Life Sciences; Child; Child health; Children; China; Chronic kidney failure; Classification; Clinical medicine; Correlation; Correlation analysis; Correlation coefficient; Correlation coefficients; Epidermal growth factor receptors; Estimation; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hospitals; Humans; Injuries; Kidney diseases; Kidney transplantation; Male; Markers; Mathematical analysis; Mathematical models; Measurement methods; Medical research; Medicine and Health Sciences; Nephrology; Nuclear medicine; Patients; Pediatrics; People and Places; Performance evaluation; Physicians; Population (statistical); Renal function; Transplants & implants; Beijing China
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180565

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is essential for renal function evaluation and classification of chronic kidney disease (CKD), while the reference method in children are cumbersome. In the Chinese children, there was no data about GFR measured through plasma or renal clearance of the exogenous markers, and therefore no validated GFR-estimating tools in this population. We measured GFR with double-sample plasma clearance of 99mTc-DTPA (mGFR) in 87 hospitalized children with renal injury. Using mGFR as the golden standard, we evaluate the efficiency of four different GFR estimation equations (the original and update Schwartz equation, the Filler equation, the CKiD equation) by statistical parameters of correlation, precision and accuracy. In our population, mGFR was 97.0± 31.9 mL/min/1.73m2. The updated Schwartz equation, the Filler equation and the CKiD equation, produced eGFR with strong correlation with mGFR, strong explanation capacity of variance in mGFR, small bias, satisfactory performance in Bland-Altman analysis, high intra-class correlation coefficients, high ratio of eGFR within mGFR±10% and eGFR within mGFR±30%, good agreement in CKD staging between eGFR and mGFR. The original Schwartz equation produced eGFR with large bias, poor precision and accuracy. The validated equations to estimate GFR in our patients are the updated Schwartz equation, which is simple for bedside use, the Filler equation and the CKiD equation, which provide more accurate eGFR. The original Schwartz equation should not be applied to estimate GFR in Chinese children with kidney injuries.