Formal Comment: Romer study fails at following core principles of reanalysis
About the Authors: Jeffrey A. Bridge Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing * E-mail: Jeff.Bridge@Nationwidechildrens.org Affiliations Abig...
Saved in:
| Published in | PloS one Vol. 15; no. 11; p. e0237184 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
United States
Public Library of Science
18.11.2020
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Summary: | About the Authors: Jeffrey A. Bridge Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing * E-mail: Jeff.Bridge@Nationwidechildrens.org Affiliations Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States of America, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, United States of America ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3726-8978 Joel B. Greenhouse Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing Affiliation: Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America Kelly J. Kelleher Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing Affiliations Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States of America, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, United States of America John V. Campo Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing Affiliation: West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States of America Citation: Bridge JA, Greenhouse JB, Kelleher KJ, Campo JV (2020) Formal Comment: Romer study fails at following core principles of reanalysis. [...]his forecasts will have less precision than ours. [...]his suggestion that the interest of the producers of 13RW in “portraying the harmful effects of youth culture, especially on young women, may have had some benefits” [1] could be interpreted as gratuitous. [...]our original analysis controlled for the secular trends that Romer mentions and was the product of interdisciplinary team science. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Commentary-1 Competing Interests: Dr. Bridge receives research grant funding from the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); he serves on the Scientific Advisory Board of Clarigent Health. Dr. Greenhouse receives research grant funding from the NIMH and Novartis Pharmaceutical Company; he serves on the editorial board of Statistics in Medicine. Dr. Kelleher receives research grant funding from the National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA), NIMH, the U.S. Department of Education, and PCORI; he serves on the SAMHSA Advisory Council. Dr. Campo receives research grant funding the NIMH, the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, and the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources; he serves on the editorial board of JAMA Pediatrics. Drs. Bridge, Greenhouse, Kelleher, and Campo are authors of the work disputed by Romer 2020. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. |
| ISSN: | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0237184 |