General population perspectives of dementia risk reduction and the implications for intervention: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 16; no. 9; p. e0257540
• Main Authors: Curran, Eleanor, Chong, Terence W H, Godbee, Kali, Abraham, Charles, Lautenschlager, Nicola T, Palmer, Victoria J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 17.09.2021; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Behavior; Biology and Life Sciences; Care and treatment; Co-design; Data collection; Databases, Factual; Dementia; Dementia - pathology; Dementia disorders; Dentistry; Education; Empowerment; Evaluation; Health risks; Health sciences; Hospitals; Humans; Intervention; Knowledge; Life Style; Medical schools; Medicine; Medicine and Health Sciences; Mental health; Methods; Population; Psychiatry; Public health; Public health administration; Qualitative research; Research and Analysis Methods; Reviews; Risk analysis; Risk factors; Risk management; Risk reduction; Risk Reduction Behavior; Risk taking; Social behavior; Social Sciences; Social Support; Supervision; Synthesis; Australia; Victoria Australia
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257540

Evidence for the potential prevention of dementia through lifestyle risk factor modification is growing and has prompted examination of implementation approaches. Understanding the general population's perspectives regarding dementia risk reduction is key to implementation. This may provide useful insights into more effective and efficient ways to help people change relevant beliefs, motivations and behaviour patterns. We conducted a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence to develop an integrated model of general population dementia risk reduction perspectives and the implications for intervention in research and implementation contexts. We searched electronic databases, supplemented by lateral search techniques, to identify studies published since 1995 reporting qualitative dementia risk reduction perspectives of the non-expert general population who do not have dementia. Thematic synthesis, incorporating an expert panel discussion, was used to identify overarching themes and develop an integrated model to guide intervention to support individuals to adopt and maintain dementia risk reduction behaviour patterns. Quality of included studies and confidence in review findings were systematically appraised. We included 50 papers, reflecting the views of more than 4,500 individuals. Main themes were: 1) The need for effective education about a complex topic to prevent confusion and facilitate understanding and empowerment; 2) Personally relevant short- and long-term benefits of dementia risk reduction behaviour patterns can generate value and facilitate action; 3) Individuals benefit from trusted, reliable and sensitive support to convert understanding to personal commitment to relevant behaviour change; 4) Choice, control and relevant self-regulatory supports help individuals take-action and direct their own progress; 5) Collaborative and empowering social opportunities can facilitate and propagate dementia risk reduction behaviour change; 6) Individual behaviour patterns occur in social contexts that influence beliefs through heuristic processes and need to be understood. Findings indicate that, for intervention: 1) education is key, but both content and delivery need to be tailored; 2) complementary interventions to support self-regulation mechanisms and social processes will increase education effectiveness; 3) co-design principles should guide intervention design and delivery processes; 4) all interventions need to be supported by context-specific data. This systematic review and thematic synthesis provides a comprehensive, integrated model of the dementia risk reduction perspectives of the general population and intervention approaches to support behaviour change that can be applied in clinical trial and real-world implementation settings. Findings extend existing knowledge and may assist more effective intervention design and delivery.