Social adaptation in multi-agent model of linguistic categorization is affected by network information flow

This paper explores how information flow properties of a network affect the formation of categories shared between individuals, who are communicating through that network. Our work is based on the established multi-agent model of the emergence of linguistic categories grounded in external environmen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 12; no. 8; p. e0182490
Main Authors Zubek, Julian, Denkiewicz, Michał, Barański, Juliusz, Wróblewski, Przemysław, Rączaszek-Leonardi, Joanna, Plewczynski, Dariusz
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 15.08.2017
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper explores how information flow properties of a network affect the formation of categories shared between individuals, who are communicating through that network. Our work is based on the established multi-agent model of the emergence of linguistic categories grounded in external environment. We study how network information propagation efficiency and the direction of information flow affect categorization by performing simulations with idealized network topologies optimizing certain network centrality measures. We measure dynamic social adaptation when either network topology or environment is subject to change during the experiment, and the system has to adapt to new conditions. We find that both decentralized network topology efficient in information propagation and the presence of central authority (information flow from the center to peripheries) are beneficial for the formation of global agreement between agents. Systems with central authority cope well with network topology change, but are less robust in the case of environment change. These findings help to understand which network properties affect processes of social adaptation. They are important to inform the debate on the advantages and disadvantages of centralized systems.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Conceptualization: JRL, DP.Data curation: JB, PW.Formal analysis: JZ.Funding acquisition: DP.Investigation: JZ, JB.Methodology: JZ, JB, PW, DP.Project administration: JZ, DP.Resources: JB, PW, DP.Software: PW.Supervision: JZ, DP.Validation: MD.Visualization: JZ.Writing – original draft: JZ, MD, JB, PW.Writing – review & editing: JRL, DP.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0182490