Central Pressure Appraisal: Clinical Validation of a Subject-Specific Mathematical Model

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 11; no. 3; p. e0151523
• Main Authors: Tosello, Francesco, Guala, Andrea, Leone, Dario, Camporeale, Carlo, Bruno, Giulia, Ridolfi, Luca, Veglio, Franco, Milan, Alberto
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 24.03.2016; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Adult; Aorta; Aorta - physiology; Arterial Pressure; Biology and Life Sciences; Blood; Blood pressure; Blood Pressure Determination; Brachial Artery - physiology; Cardiovascular diseases; Cardiovascular system; Clinical medicine; Coronary vessels; Diastole; Diastolic pressure; Feasibility studies; Flow velocity; Health aspects; Heart; Hemodynamics; Hospitals; Humans; Hypertension; Internal medicine; Male; Mathematical analysis; Mathematical models; Medical electronics; Medicine; Medicine and Health Sciences; Models, Cardiovascular; Patient-Specific Modeling; Predictions; Research and Analysis Methods; Risk factors; Studies; Systematic review; Systole; Systolic pressure; Veins & arteries; Ventricle; Wave velocity; Young Adult; Sydney New South Wales Australia; Australia; Italy
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151523

Current evidence suggests that aortic blood pressure has a superior prognostic value with respect to brachial pressure for cardiovascular events, but direct measurement is not feasible in daily clinical practice. The aim of the present study is the clinical validation of a multiscale mathematical model for non-invasive appraisal of central blood pressure from subject-specific characteristics. A total of 51 young male were selected for the present study. Aortic systolic and diastolic pressure were estimated with a mathematical model and were compared to the most-used non-invasive validated technique (SphygmoCor device, AtCor Medical, Australia). SphygmoCor was calibrated through diastolic and systolic brachial pressure obtained with a sphygmomanometer, while model inputs consist of brachial pressure, height, weight, age, left-ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes, and data from a pulse wave velocity study. Model-estimated systolic and diastolic central blood pressures resulted to be significantly related to SphygmoCor-assessed central systolic (r = 0.65 p <0.0001) and diastolic (r = 0.84 p<0.0001) blood pressures. The model showed a significant overestimation of systolic pressure (+7.8 (-2.2;14) mmHg, p = 0.0003) and a significant underestimation of diastolic values (-3.2 (-7.5;1.6), p = 0.004), which imply a significant overestimation of central pulse pressure. Interestingly, model prediction errors mirror the mean errors reported in large meta-analysis characterizing the use of the SphygmoCor when non-invasive calibration is performed. In conclusion, multi-scale mathematical model predictions result to be significantly related to SphygmoCor ones. Model-predicted systolic and diastolic aortic pressure resulted in difference of less than 10 mmHg in the 51% and 84% of the subjects, respectively, when compared with SphygmoCor-obtained pressures.