A quantitative evaluation of the conservation umbrella of spotted owl management areas in the Sierra Nevada

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 10; no. 4; p. e0123778
• Main Authors: Burnett, Ryan D, Roberts, L Jay
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 23.04.2015; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Analysis; Animal behavior; Animals; Bayesian analysis; Biological monitoring; Birds; California; Conservation; Conservation of Natural Resources; Ecological monitoring; Ecosystem; Ecosystem management; Ecosystems; Forest management; Forest reserves; Habitat changes; Habitats; Home range; Occupancy; Owls; Protection and preservation; Quantitative analysis; Species richness; Strategic management; Strigiformes; Strix occidentalis occidentalis; Sustainable forestry; Wildlife conservation; California; Sierra Nevada Mountain Range; United States > US; Petaluma California; Nevada
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123778

Whether by design or default, single species management often serves as an umbrella for species with similar habitat requirements. In recent decades the focus of National Forest management in the Sierra Nevada of California has shifted towards increasing closed canopy mature forest conditions through the protection of areas occupied by the California Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis occidentalis). To evaluate the implications of these habitat changes and the potential umbrella resulting from a system of owl reserves on the broader avian community, we estimated occupancy of birds inside and outside of Spotted Owl Home Range Core Areas in northeastern California. We used point count data in a multi-species hierarchical Bayesian model incorporating the detection history of 81 species over a two-year time period (2005-2006). A small set of vegetation cover and topography covariates were included in the model to account for broad differences in habitat conditions, as well as a term identifying whether or not a site was within a Core Area. Seventeen species had a negative Core Area effect, seven had a positive effect, and the rest were not significant. Estimated species richness was significantly different with 23.1 species per 100 m radius circle outside Core Areas and 21.7 inside Core Areas. The majority of the species negatively associated with Core Areas are tied to early successional and other disturbance-dependent habitats. Conservation and climate vulnerability rankings were mixed. On average we found higher scores (greater risk) for the species positively associated with Core Areas, but a larger number of species with the highest scores were negatively associated with Core Areas. We discuss the implications for managing the Sierra Nevada ecosystem and illustrate the role of monitoring broader suites of species in guiding management of large complex ecosystems.