Surgical treatment of primary solitary fibrous tumors involving the pelvic ring

The surgical treatment of primary solitary fibrous tumors (SFT) involving the pelvic ring has not been reported previously. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of surgical treatment for this disease. From 2009 to 2015, 13 patients underwent tumor resection at our hospital, with an avera...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 13; no. 11; p. e0207581
Main Authors Wang, Yifei, Wei, Ran, Ji, Tao, Chen, Zhongyan, Guo, Wei
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 27.11.2018
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The surgical treatment of primary solitary fibrous tumors (SFT) involving the pelvic ring has not been reported previously. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of surgical treatment for this disease. From 2009 to 2015, 13 patients underwent tumor resection at our hospital, with an average age of 49.5 years (27-68 years). Four patients underwent en bloc resection, and 9 patients underwent piecemeal resections. A Chi-square test was used to compare the postoperative recurrence rates between the en bloc resection and the piecemeal resection groups (p = 0.68), and no significant difference was found between the benign and malignant solitary fibrous tumor groups (p = 0.44). The 5-year survival rate of the patients in this study was 83.3%, and the 5-year progression-free survival rate was 63.5%. The progression-free survival rate was not significantly different between the en bloc resection and piecemeal resection groups (p = 0.97). Piecemeal resection can also achieve acceptable local control, particularly for patients with sacral tumors, as they may achieve even better postoperative function with sacral nerve preservation. Recurrence and metastasis occur relatively late in the course of this disease. Therefore, long-term follow-up is required.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0207581