A cross-sectional study of partograph utilization as a decision making tool for referral of abnormal labour in primary health care facilities of Bangladesh

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 13; no. 9; p. e0203617
• Main Authors: Khan, Abdullah Nurus Salam, Billah, Sk Masum, Mannan, Ishtiaq, Mannan, Imteaz Ibne, Begum, Tahmina, Khan, Marufa Aziz, Islam, Munia, Ahasan, S M Monirul, Rahman, Jebun Nessa, George, Joby, Arifeen, Shams El, Meena, Umme Salma Jahan, Rashid, Iftekhar, Graft-Johnson, Joseph de
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 06.09.2018; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Analysis; Babies; Bangladesh; Beliefs, opinions and attitudes; Biology and Life Sciences; Childbirth & labor; Children; Children & youth; Childrens health; Clinical decision making; Cross-Sectional Studies; Decision Making; Female; Health care; Health facilities; Heart rate; Hospitals; Humans; Labor (Obstetrics); Labor, Obstetric; Maternal & child health; Maternal mortality; Medical personnel; Medical records; Medicine and Health Sciences; Midwifery; Obstetrics; Practice; Pregnancy; Primary care; Primary Health Care; Public health; Quality assessment; Reviews; Social Sciences; Studies; Utilization; Workers; Young Adult; Bangladesh
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203617

In Bangladesh, female paramedics known as Family Welfare Visitors (FWVs), conduct normal deliveries in first-level primary care facilities, or Union Health and Family Welfare Centres (UH&FWC). Utilization of partographs allow for early identification of abnormal labour and referral for advanced care to Emergency Obstetric Care (EmOC) facilities. A systematic assessment of the quality of partograph utilization in clinical-decision making will contribute to understanding the use of the tool by health workers. In 2013, the USAID supported MaMoni HSS project, led in country by Save the Children, trained FWVs on the use of partographs in five UH&FWCs in Habiganj district. As part of the follow-up after training, intrapartum case record forms, accompanying partographs, and referral registers for all obstetric cases managed in these five facilities from July 2013 to June 2014 were reviewed. Partographs were reviewed to identify abnormal labour cases based on pre-defined indications. All referred cases were ascertained from the case records in the referral registers. Five health workers were interviewed to assess their knowledge, attitude and experience in partograph use and to explore the challenges for referral decision making associated with the tool. A total of 1,198 deliveries were managed at the study sites, of which 663 presented with cervical dilatation of 8 cm or less. Partographs were initiated in 98% of these cases. Indication of abnormal labour was found in 71 partographs (11%) and among them, only 1 was referred to a higher-level facility. Foetal heart rate and cervical dilatation were appropriately recorded in 61% and 70% of the partographs, respectively. Interviews with health workers revealed poor interpretation of referral indications from the partographs. Limited accessibility to the nearest EmOC facility, inadequate time for referral, and non-compliance to referral by clients were identified by the interviewed health workers as the key barriers for referral decision making. Supporting the health workers at first-level primary care facilities to better interpret and act on partograph data in a timely manner, and strengthening the referral systems are needed to ensure that women in labour receive the prompt quality care they and their babies require to survive.