Comparison of Depletion Strategies for the Enrichment of Low-Abundance Proteins in Urine

Proteome analysis of complex biological samples for biomarker identification remains challenging, among others due to the extended range of protein concentrations. High-abundance proteins like albumin or IgG of plasma and urine, may interfere with the detection of potential disease biomarkers. Curre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 10; no. 7; p. e0133773
Main Authors Filip, Szymon, Vougas, Konstantinos, Zoidakis, Jerome, Latosinska, Agnieszka, Mullen, William, Spasovski, Goce, Mischak, Harald, Vlahou, Antonia, Jankowski, Joachim
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 24.07.2015
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Proteome analysis of complex biological samples for biomarker identification remains challenging, among others due to the extended range of protein concentrations. High-abundance proteins like albumin or IgG of plasma and urine, may interfere with the detection of potential disease biomarkers. Currently, several options are available for the depletion of abundant proteins in plasma. However, the applicability of these methods in urine has not been thoroughly investigated. In this study, we compared different, commercially available immunodepletion and ion-exchange based approaches on urine samples from both healthy subjects and CKD patients, for their reproducibility and efficiency in protein depletion. A starting urine volume of 500 μL was used to simulate conditions of a multi-institutional biomarker discovery study. All depletion approaches showed satisfactory reproducibility (n=5) in protein identification as well as protein abundance. Comparison of the depletion efficiency between the unfractionated and fractionated samples and the different depletion strategies, showed efficient depletion in all cases, with the exception of the ion-exchange kit. The depletion efficiency was found slightly higher in normal than in CKD samples and normal samples yielded more protein identifications than CKD samples when using both initial as well as corresponding depleted fractions. Along these lines, decrease in the amount of albumin and other targets as applicable, following depletion, was observed. Nevertheless, these depletion strategies did not yield a higher number of identifications in neither the urine from normal nor CKD patients. Collectively, when analyzing urine in the context of CKD biomarker identification, no added value of depletion strategies can be observed and analysis of unfractionated starting urine appears to be preferable.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Conceived and designed the experiments: SF KV JZ WM HM AV. Performed the experiments: SF KV WM. Analyzed the data: SF AL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: KV WM AV. Wrote the paper: SF JZ AL GS HM AV JJ.
Competing Interests: Mosaiques Diagnostics GmbH provided support in the form of salaries for authors (HM), but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0133773